<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ecna</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Экономика науки</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economics of Science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2410-132X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-4680</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Delo Publishing house</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22394/2410-132X-2017-4-1-30-46</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ecna-114</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Методология</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Methodology</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ТЕХНОЛОГИЧЕСКИ РАЗВИТАЯ КОМПАНИЯ: МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ОПРЕДЕЛЕНИЯ СТАТУСА</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED COMPANY: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF STATUS DETERMINATION</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ерёмченко</surname><given-names>О. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Yeremchenko</surname><given-names>O. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>старший научный сотрудник Центра научно-технической экспертизы.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Moscow.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">tatrics@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ИПЭИ РАНХиГС.</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>The  Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>05</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>30</fpage><lpage>46</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Ерёмченко О.А., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ерёмченко О.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Yeremchenko O.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/114">https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/114</self-uri><abstract><p>Целью настоящего исследования было выполнение обзора индикаторов и критериев, на основании которых зарубежные и российские компании можно отнести к числу технологически развитых и инновационных. Были сопоставлены используемые международными и отечественными аналитическими компаниями подходы к выявлению и ранжированию технологически развитых компаний, а также перечни компаний, занявших первые позиции в различных рейтингах 2017–2018 гг. Подтверждена гипотеза об отсутствии единого методологически обоснованного подхода к выявлению высокотехнологичных компаний мира. Показано, что перечни компаний-лидеров глобальных рейтингов инновационных компаний слабо коррелируют между собой и зависят от набора используемых индикаторов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of this study was to perform a survey of indicators and criteria on the basis of which foreign and Russian companies can be classified as technologically advanced and innovative. We compared the approaches used by international and domestic analytical companies to identify and rank technologically advanced companies, as well as lists of companies that ranked first in the various ratings of 2017–2018. A hypothesis was confirmed that there is no single methodologically valid approach to identifying high-tech companies in the world. It is shown that the lists of companies that are the leaders of global ratings of innovative companies in the world are weakly correlated and depend on the set of indicators used.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>технологически развитая компания</kwd><kwd> рейтинги компаний</kwd><kwd> расходы на НИОКР</kwd><kwd> инновации</kwd><kwd>  выручка</kwd><kwd> инновационная премия</kwd><kwd> ТехУспех</kwd><kwd> рэнкинг</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>technologically advanced company</kwd><kwd> company ratings</kwd><kwd> R&amp;D expenditures</kwd><kwd> innovation</kwd><kwd> revenue</kwd><kwd>  innovation premium</kwd><kwd> TechUp</kwd><kwd> ranking</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поддержка частных высокотехнологических компаний-лидеров «Национальных чемпионов» (2018) / РВК. https://www.rvc.ru/eco/p2/strategic_agenda/102912.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Support for private high-tech companies –  leaders of the «National Champions» (2018) / RVC. https:// www.rvc.ru/eco/p2/strategic_agenda/102912.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jaegers T., Lipp-Lingua C., Amil D. (2013) Hightechnology and medium-high technology industries main drivers of EU-27’s industrial growth // Eurosts. Statistics in Focus 1/2013. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:High-technology_versus_low-technologymanufacturing#cite_note-2.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jaegers T., Lipp-Lingua C., Amil D. (2013) Hightechnology and medium-high technology industries main drivers of EU-27’s industrial growth // Eurosts. Statistics in Focus 1/2013. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:High-technology_versus_low-technology_manufacturing#cite_note-2.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The 2017 EU Industrial R&amp;D Investment Scoreboard (2018) / European Commission – Joint Research Centre. http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard17.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The 2017 EU Industrial R&amp;D Investment Scoreboard (2018) / European Commission –  Joint Research Centre. http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard17.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">HOLT (2018) / Credit Suisse. 14.02.2018. https://www.credit-suisse.com/sites/holt/en.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">HOLT (2018) / Credit Suisse. 14.02.2018. https:// www.credit-suisse.com/sites/holt/en.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jeff D., Gregersen H. (2017) How We Rank The Most Innovative Companies 2017 // Forbes. 08.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2017/08/08/how-we-rank-the-most-innovative-companies-2017/#69cb7bdd5c46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jeff D., Gregersen H. (2017) How We Rank The Most Innovative Companies 2017 // Forbes. 08.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2017/08/08/how-we-rank-the-mostinnovative-companies-2017/#69cb7bdd5c46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kauflin J. (2017) The World’s Most Innovative Growth Companies 2017 // Forbes. 17.05.2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2017/05/17/the-worlds-most-innovativegrowth-companies-2017/#b2731a645ca7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kauflin J. (2017) The World’s Most Innovative Growth Companies 2017 // Forbes. 17.05.2017. https:// www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2017/05/17/the-worlds-most-innovative-growthcompanies-2017/#b2731a645ca7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Methodology. 2017 Top 100 Global Innovators (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. http://top100innovators.clarivate.com/content/methodology.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Methodology. 2017 Top 100 Global Innovators (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. http://top100innovators.clarivate.com/content/methodology.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Top 100 Global Innovator 2017 (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. https://clarivate.com/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/Clarivate-Analytics-2017-Top-100-Global-Innovators.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Top 100 Global Innovator 2017 (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Clarivate-Analytics-2017Top-100-Global-Innovators.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">50 Smartest Companies 2017 (2018) / MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/lists/companies/2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">50 Smartest Companies 2017 (2018) / MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/lists/companies/2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Strategy&amp;’s 2017 Global Innovation 1000 study Methodology (2018) / Pw C. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000-UK#VisualTabs3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Strategy&amp;’s 2017 Global Innovation 1000 study Methodology (2018) / Pw C. https:// www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000UK#VisualTabs3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Most Innovative Companies 2018 (2018) / Boston Consulting Group. http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/BCG-Most-Innovative-CompaniesJan-2018_tcm27–180700.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Most Innovative Companies 2018 (2018) / Boston Consulting Group. http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/BCG-Most-Innovative-CompaniesJan-2018_tcm27–180700.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Drucker Institute’s company ranking – 2017 (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankings-2017.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Drucker Institute’s company ranking –  2017 (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankings-2017.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Methodology for the Management Top 250 Company Rankings (2017) / The Wall Street Journal. 05.12.2017. https://www.wsj.com/articles/methodology-for-the-management-top-250-companyrankings-1512482700.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Methodology for the Management Top 250 Company Rankings (2017) / The Wall Street Journal. 05.12.2017. https://www.wsj.com/articles/methodology-for-the-management-top-250company-rankings-1512482700.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Principles underlying The Drucker Institute’s company ranking (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankings-principles.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Principles underlying The Drucker Institute’s company ranking (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankingsprinciples.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рейтинг инновационных регионов России: версия 2017 (2018) / АИИР. http://www.i-regions.org/images/files/airr17.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rating of innovative regions of Russia: version 2017 (2018) / AIRR. http://www.i-regions.org/images/files/airr17.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рейтинг ТехУспех 2017. Методология (2018) / ТехУспех. http://www.ratingtechup.ru/about/methodology.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">TechUp Rating 2017. Methodology (2018) / TechUp. http://www.ratingtechup.ru/about/methodology.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
