ecnaЭкономика наукиEconomics of Science2410-132X2949-4680Delo Publishing house10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-2-111-134ecna-310Research ArticleЭкономика научных исследованийEconomics of the scientific ResearchКонцептуальная модель оценки технологической готовности научно-технологического проекта и его потенциала на ранних стадиях разработкиA Conceptual Model for Assessing the Technological Readiness of a R&D Project and its Potential at the Early Stages of Developmenthttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4703-4702КомаровА. В.KomarovA. V.

Комаров Алексей Валерьевич – кандидат технических наук, старший научный сотрудник отдела аналитических исследований

Web of Science ResearcherID: ABI-1166-2020

123557, г. Москва, Пресненский Вал, д. 19, строение 1 

Komarov Aleksey Valer’evich – Senior Researcher, Analytical Research Department

Web of Science ResearcherID: ABI-1166-2020

123557, Moscow, Presnensky Val 19, bld. 1 

abkom@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-2059ПихтарьА. Н.PikhtarA. N.

Пихтарь Александр Николаевич – генеральный директор,

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAN-2745-2021

115114, г. Москва, 1-й Дербеневский пер., д. 5, строение 6 

Pikhtar Aleksandr Nikolaevich – CEO

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAN-2745-2021

115114, Moscow, 1st Derbenevskiy lane 5, buld. 6 

apikhtar@totsystems.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-6648ГриневскийИ. В.GrinevskyI. V.

Гриневский Игорь Всеволодович – руководитель группы аналитики

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAN-2751–2021

115114, г. Москва, 1-й Дербеневский пер., д. 5, строение 6 

Grinevsky Igor Vsevolodovich – Head of analytics

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAN-2745-2021

115114, Moscow, 1st Derbenevskiy lane 5, buld. 6 

igrinevskij@totsystems.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-7350КомаровК. А.KomarovK. A.

Комаров Кирилл Алексеевич – ведущий специалист отдела аналитических исследований

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAH-2512–2021

123557, г. Москва, Пресненский Вал, д. 19, строение 1 

Komarov Kirill Alekseevich – Leading Specialist of the Analytical Research Department

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAH-2512-2021

123557, Moscow, Presnensky Val 19, bld. 1 

kirill.080789@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-1172ГолицынЛ. В.GolitsynL. V.

Голицын Лев Викторович – руководитель проектов

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAO-7260–2021

115114, г. Москва, 1-й Дербеневский пер., д. 5, строение 6 

Golitsyn Lev Viktorovich – Project Manager

Web of Science ResearcherID: AAO-7260-2021

115114, Moscow, 1st Derbenevskiy lane 5, buld. 6 

lvgolitsyn@totsystems.ruФГБНУ «Дирекция научно-технических программ»Directorate of State Scientific and Technical ProgrammesООО «TOT Systems»TOT Systems LLC20212607202172111134Copyright © Комаров А.В., Пихтарь А.Н., Гриневский И.В., Комаров К.А., Голицын Л.В., 20212021Комаров А.В., Пихтарь А.Н., Гриневский И.В., Комаров К.А., Голицын Л.В.Komarov A.V., Pikhtar A.N., Grinevsky I.V., Komarov K.A., Golitsyn L.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/310

В статье предложена концептуальная модель оценки технологической готовности и потенциала научно-технологического проекта на ранних стадиях его разработки (TPRA). Предлагаемая модель позволит в рамках единого инструмента проводить оценку готовности разрабатываемой технологии, коммерческого потенциала результатов научно-технологических проектов, оценку возможности участия результатов проектов в трансфере технологий, возможности использовать полученные результаты в качестве научно-технического задела. Получаемые при оценке результаты могут быть использованы для повышения эффективности планирования и осуществления R&D-деятельности в органах управления институтов инновационного развития, а также в корпорациях и организациях, инвестирующих в R&D процессы.

The article proposes a conceptual model for assessing the technological readiness and the potential of a R&D project at the early stages of its development (TPRA – Technology Project Readiness Assessment). The proposed model will allow to assess the technological readiness of the scientific and technological projects, the commercial potential of their results, the possibility of participation of the results of projects in the transfer of technologies, the possibility of using the results obtained as a scientific and technical groundwork, as well as the risks of nonfulfillment of projects within the framework of a single tool. The results that can be obtained in the assessment process can be used to improve the efficiency of planning and implementation of R&D in the institutions for innovative development, as well as in corporations and organizations that invest in R&D processes.

научно-технологический проектНИОКРуровень готовности технологииУГТрисккоммерческий потенциалтрансфер технологийвостребованность результатовscientific and technological projectR&Dtechnology readiness levelTRLtechnology project potential assessmentTPRAriskcommercial potentialtechnology transferdemand for resultsReferencesHenriksen A.D., Traynor A.J. (1999) A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 46(2):158–170. DOI: 10.1109/17.759144.Henriksen A.D., Traynor A.J. (1999) A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 46(2):158–170. DOI: 10.1109/17.759144.Logar C.M., Ponzurick T.G., Spears J.R., Russo France K. (2001) Commercializing intellectual property: a university-industry alliance for new product development //Journal of Product & Brand Management. 10(4):206–217. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000005672.Logar C.M., Ponzurick T.G., Spears J.R., Russo France K. (2001) Commercializing intellectual property: a university-industry alliance for new product development //Journal of Product & Brand Management. 10(4):206–217. DOI: 10.1108/EUM0000000005672.Estep J., Daim T.U. (2016) A Framework for Technology Transfer Potential Assessment // 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). Honolulu, HI, USA. Pp. 2846–2852. DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806626.Estep J., Daim T.U. (2016) A Framework for Technology Transfer Potential Assessment // 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET). Honolulu, HI, USA. Pp. 2846–2852. DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2016.7806626.Kathleen R. (2003) Allen. Bringing New Technology to Market. New Jersy: Prentice Hall.Kathleen R. (2003) Allen. Bringing New Technology to Market. New Jersy: Prentice Hall.Lipkova L., Braga D. (2016) Measuring Commercialization Success of Innovations in the EU // Маркетинг i менеджмент iнновацiй. 4:15–30.Lipkova L., Braga D. (2016) Measuring Commercialization Success of Innovations in the EU // Маркетинг i менеджмент iнновацiй. 4:15–30.Смирнов С.С., Горбунов В.В. (2013) Методический подход к оценке достаточности научно-технического задела для разработки перспективного вооружения // Вооружение и экономика. 2(23):44–51.Smirnov S.S., Gorbunov V.V. (2013) Methodological approach to assessing the sufficiency of scientific and technical groundwork for the development of advanced weapons // Armament and Economics. 2(23):44–51. (In Russ.)Lavoie J.R., Kim J., Daim T.U. (2017) A Technology Transfer Framework: A Case Study from the Energy Sector // International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 8(4):249–260. DOI: 10.18178/ijimt.2017.8.4.737.Lavoie J.R., Kim J., Daim T.U. (2017) A Technology Transfer Framework: A Case Study from the Energy Sector // International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. 8(4):249–260. DOI: 10.18178/ijimt.2017.8.4.737.Jain R.K., Martyniuk A.O., Harris M.M., Niemann R.E., Woldmann K. (2003) Evaluating the commercial potential of emerging technologies // International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 2(1):32–50. DOI: 10.1504/IJTTC.2003.001800.Jain R.K., Martyniuk A.O., Harris M.M., Niemann R.E., Woldmann K. (2003) Evaluating the commercial potential of emerging technologies // International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 2(1):32–50. DOI: 10.1504/IJTTC.2003.001800.Oosthuizen R., Buys A.J. (2003) The Development and Evaluation of an Improved Cloverleaf Model for the Assessment of Technology Readiness for Commercialisation // SA Journal of Industrial Engineering. 14(1):111–123. DOI: 10.7166/14-1-302.Oosthuizen R., Buys A.J. (2003) The Development and Evaluation of an Improved Cloverleaf Model for the Assessment of Technology Readiness for Commercialisation // SA Journal of Industrial Engineering. 14(1):111–123. DOI: 10.7166/14-1-302.Chifos C., Jain R.K. (1997) A Comprehensive Methodology for Evaluating the Commercial Potential of Technologies: The Strategic Technology Evaluation Method // International journal of industrial engineering: applications and practice. 4(4):220–235.Chifos C., Jain R.K. (1997) A Comprehensive Methodology for Evaluating the Commercial Potential of Technologies: The Strategic Technology Evaluation Method // International journal of industrial engineering: applications and practice. 4(4):220–235.Постановление Правительства РФ от 21.05.2013 г. № 426 (2013) О федеральной целевой программе «Исследования и разработки по приоритетным направлениям развития научно-технологического комплекса России на 2014–2020 годы» / Гарант. http://base.garant.ru/70385450.Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 21.05.2013 № 426 (2013) On the federal target program “Research and development in priority areas of development of the scientific and technological complex of Russia for 2014–2020” / Garant. http://base.garant.ru/70385450. (In Russ.)Auerswald P., Branscomb L.M., Demos N., Min B.K. (2005) Understanding Private-Sector Decision Making for Early-Stage Technology Development / NIST, U.S. Department of Commerce, 63 p.Auerswald P., Branscomb L.M., Demos N., Min B.K. (2005) Understanding Private-Sector Decision Making for Early-Stage Technology Development / NIST, U.S. Department of Commerce, 63 p.Dubos G.F., Saleh J.H., Braun R. (2008) Technology Readiness Level, Schedule Risk and Slippage in Spacecraft Design // Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 45(4):836–842. DOI: 10.2514/1.34947.Dubos G.F., Saleh J.H., Braun R. (2008) Technology Readiness Level, Schedule Risk and Slippage in Spacecraft Design // Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets. 45(4):836–842. DOI: 10.2514/1.34947.Bitman W.R., Sharif N. (2008) A Conceptual Framework for Ranking R&D Projects // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 55(2):267–278. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2008.919725.Bitman W.R., Sharif N. (2008) A Conceptual Framework for Ranking R&D Projects // IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 55(2):267–278. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2008.919725.Baek DH., Sul W., Hong KP., Kim H. (2007) A Technology Valuation Model to Support Technology Transfer Negotiations // R&D Management. 37(2):123–138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 9310.2007.00462x.Baek DH., Sul W., Hong KP., Kim H. (2007) A Technology Valuation Model to Support Technology Transfer Negotiations // R&D Management. 37(2):123–138. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9310.2007.00462x.Bandarian R. (2007) Evaluation of Commercial Potential of a New Technology at the Early Stage of Development with Fuzzy Logic // Journal of Technology Management and Innovation. 2(4):73–85.Bandarian R. (2007) Evaluation of Commercial Potential of a New Technology at the Early Stage of Development with Fuzzy Logic // Journal of Technology Management and Innovation. 2(4):73–85.Belina B., Giesko T., Lopacinska L., Walasik M. (2013) Setting of criteria in the commercial potential assessment method of innovative technological solutions // Problemy Eksploatacji. 2:221–234.Belina B., Giesko T., Lopacinska L., Walasik M. (2013) Setting of criteria in the commercial potential assessment method of innovative technological solutions // Problemy Eksploatacji. 2:221–234.Конкурсная документация по проведению конкурсного отбора проектов прикладных научных исследований и экспериментальных разработок коммерческой направленности (2014) / Официальный веб-сайт ФЦП. Мероприятие 1.4, 2 очередь. http://fcpir.ru/participation_in_program/contests/list_of_contests/6_competitionfinished/2014-14-582-0002/).Competitive documentation for the competitive selection of projects of applied scientific research and experimental development of a commercial focus (2014) / FTP official website. Activity 1.4, stage 2. http://fcpir.ru/participation_in_program/contests/list_of_contests/6_competitionfinished/2014-14-582-0002/). (In Russ.)Зеленцова Н.И., Петров А.Н., Гарина С.М., Тузова С.Ю. (2017) Об экспертном рассмотрении заявок на получение бюджетного финансирования в рамках ФЦП «Исследования и разработки по приоритетным направлениям развития научно-технологического комплекса России на 2014–2020 годы» // Инновации. 2(220):86–92.Zelentsova N.I., Petrov A.N., Garina S.M., Tuzova S.Yu. (2017) On expert consideration of applications for budget financing under the federal target program “Research and development in priority areas of development of the scientific and technological complex of Russia for 2014–2020” // Innovations. 2(220):86–92. (In Russ.)Постановление Правительства Республики Казахстан от 01.08.2011 г. № 891 (2011) Об утверждении Правил организации и проведения государственной научно-технической экспертизы. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31041339.Decree of the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated 01.08.2011 № 891 (2011) On approval of the Rules for organizing and conducting state scientific and technical expertise. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31041339. (In Russ.)Назаревич С.А. (2013) Первичная оценка потенциального новшества в структуре жизненного цикла научно-технических исследований // Молодой ученый. 5(52):91–94.Nazarevich S.A. (2013) Primary assessment of potential innovation in the structure of the life cycle of scientific and technical research // Young scientist. 5(52):91–94. (In Russ.)Постановление Государственного комитета по науке и технологиям республики Беларусь от 03.01.2008 г. № 1/1 (2008) Об утверждении Методических рекомендаций по оценке эффективности научных, научно-технических и инновационных разработок.Resolution of the State Committee for Science and Technology of the Republic of Belarus dated 03.01.2008 № 1/1 (2008) On the approval of Methodological Recommendations for assessing the effectiveness of scientific, scientific, technical and innovative developments. (In Russ.)Приказ Минпромторга России от 18.05.2016 г. № 1591 (2016) Об утверждении методики проведения научно-технической оценки комплексных проектов / Техэксперт. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/566162113.Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia dated 18.05.2016 № 1591 (2016) On approval of the methodology for conducting scientific and technical assessment of complex projects / Techexpert. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/566162113. (In Russ.)Методика проведения экспертной оценки соответствия технологий производства продукции (товаров, услуг) гражданского назначения мировому уровню (2013) / Российская венчурная компания, Москва.Methodology for expert assessment of the conformity of production technologies for civilian products (goods, services) to the world level (2013) / Russian Venture Company, Moscow. (In Russ.)Ковалев С.П., Яшина Е.Р., Турзин П.С., Лукичев К.Е. (2020) Особенности экспертной оценки инвестиционных проектов на примере медицинской отрасли // Экономика науки. 6(4):287–296. DOI: 10.22394/2410–132X-2020-6-4-287-296.Kovalev S.P., Yashina E.R., Turzin P.S., Lukichev K.E. (2020) Features of expert assessment of investment projects on the example of the medical industry // The Economics of Science. 6(4):287–296. DOI: 10.22394/2410–132X-2020-6-4-287-296. (In Russ.)Boehm B., Reifer D. et al. (2000) Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice-Hall.Boehm B., Reifer D. et al. (2000) Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II. Prentice-Hall.Heslop L.A., McGregor E., Griffith M. (2001) Development of a Technology Readiness Assessment Measure: The Cloverleaf Model of Technology Transfer // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 26:369–384. DOI: doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139021356.Heslop L.A., McGregor E., Griffith M. (2001) Development of a Technology Readiness Assessment Measure: The Cloverleaf Model of Technology Transfer // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 26:369- 384. DOI: doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139021356.Zemlickiene V., Bubliene R., Jakubavicius A. (2018) A model for assessing the commercial potential of high technologies // Oeconomia Copernicana. 9(1):29–54. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2018.002.Zemlickiene V., Bubliene R., Jakubavicius A. (2018) A model for assessing the commercial potential of high technologies // Oeconomia Copernicana. 9(1):29–54. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2018.002.Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J. (2006) Stage-Gate and the Critical Success Factors for New Product Development. https://www.bptrends.com/bpt/wpcontent/publicationfiles/07-06-ART-Stage-GateForProductDev-Cooper-Edgett1.pdf.Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J. (2006) Stage-Gate and the Critical Success Factors for New Product Development. https://www.bptrends.com/bpt/wpcontent/publicationfiles/07-06-ART-Stage-GateForProductDev-Cooper-Edgett1.pdf.Valerdi R., Boehm B.W., Reifer D.J. (2003) COSYSMO: A Constructive Systems Engineering Cost Model Coming of Age / 13th Annual INCOSE International Symposium. Washington, DC. 13(1). Pp. 70–82. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334–5837.2003.tb02601.x.Valerdi R., Boehm B.W., Reifer D.J. (2003) COSYSMO: A Constructive Systems Engineering Cost Model Coming of Age / 13th Annual INCOSE International Symposium. Washington, DC. 13(1). Pp. 70–82. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334–5837.2003.tb02601.x.Елисеев Е.А., Павлова Е.А. (2013) Анализ методических подходов к оценке инвестиционных научно-технических проектов // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2.Eliseev E.A., Pavlova E.A. (2013) Analysis of methodological approaches to the assessment of investment scientific and technical projects // Modern problems of science and education. 2. (In Russ.)Jain R.K., Chifos C. (1998) Strategic technology evaluation program: an innovative approach to facilitating technology diffusion – Volume I: Overview report, University of Cincinnati, College of Engineering.Jain R.K., Chifos C. (1998) Strategic technology evaluation program: an innovative approach to facilitating technology diffusion – Volume I: Overview report, University of Cincinnati, College of Engineering.Afful-Dadzie E., Afful-Dadzie A., Oplatkova Z.K. (2017) Assessing Commercial Viability of Technology Start-up Businesses in a Government Venture Capital under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment // Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 19:400–413. DOI: 10.1007/s40815-016-0141-9.Afful-Dadzie E., Afful-Dadzie A., Oplatkova Z.K. (2017) Assessing Commercial Viability of Technology Start-up Businesses in a Government Venture Capital under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment // Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 19:400–413. DOI: 10.1007/s40815-016-0141-9.Martyniuk A.O., Jain R., Haft M.N. (2002) Market Opportunity Analyses and Technology Transfer // International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 1(4):91–99. DOI: 10.1504/IJTTC.2002.001795.Martyniuk A.O., Jain R., Haft M.N. (2002) Market Opportunity Analyses and Technology Transfer // International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation. 1(4):91–99. DOI: 10.1504/IJTTC.2002.001795.Zemlickiene V., Maciulis A., Tvaronaviciene M. (2017) Factors Impacting the Commercial Potential of Technologies: Expert Approach // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 23(2):410– 427. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2016.1271061.Zemlickiene V., Maciulis A., Tvaronaviciene M. (2017) Factors Impacting the Commercial Potential of Technologies: Expert Approach // Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 23(2):410– 427. DOI: 10.3846/20294913.2016.1271061.Одинцов Л.Г., Мещеряков Е.М., Румянцева В.С. (2003) Методика оценки результатов научно-технических работ //Технологии гражданской безопасности. 10(1):68–74.Odintsov L.G., Meshcheryakov E.M., Rumyantseva V.S. (2003) Methodology for assessing the results of scientific and technical work // Civil security technologies. 10(1):68–74. (In Russ.)Poh K.L., Ang B.W., Bai F. (2001) A Comparative Analysis of R&D Project Evaluation Methods //R&D Management. 31(1):63–75. DOI: 10.1111/1467–9310.00197.Poh K.L., Ang B.W., Bai F. (2001) A Comparative Analysis of R&D Project Evaluation Methods //R&D Management. 31(1):63–75. DOI: 10.1111/1467–9310.00197.Khadtare M., Smith E. (2011) Fractal-COSYSMO Systems Engineering Cost Estimation for Complex Projects // Procedia Computer Science. 6:88–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.08.018.Khadtare M., Smith E. (2011) Fractal-COSYSMO Systems Engineering Cost Estimation for Complex Projects // Procedia Computer Science. 6:88–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2011.08.018.Сартори А.В, Ильина Н.А., Манцевич Н.М. (2019) Концепция оценки потенциала коммерциализации результатов НИОКР в научных организациях и вузах // Высшее образование сегодня. 6:11–25. DOI: 10.25586/RNU.HET.19.06.P.11.Sartori A.V., Ilyina N.A., Mantsevich N.M. (2019) The concept of assessing the potential for the commercialization of R&D results in scientific organizations and universities // Higher education today. 6:11–25. DOI: 10.25586/RNU.HET.19.06.P.11. (In Russ.)Петров А.Н., Сартори А.В., Филимонов А.В. (2016) Комплексная оценка состояния научно-технических проектов через уровень готовности технологий // Экономика науки. 2(4):244–260.Petrov A.N., Sartori A.V., Filimonov A.V. (2016) Comprehensive assessment of the state of scientific and technical projects through the level of technology readiness // The Economics of Science. 2(4):244–260. (In Russ.)Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2002) Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best Practices Companies Do-I // Research-Technology Management. 45(5):21–27. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2002.11671518.Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2002) Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best Practices Companies Do-I // Research-Technology Management. 45(5):21–27. DOI: doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2002.11671518.Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2002) Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do-II // ResearchTechnology Management. 45(6):43–49. DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2002.11671532.Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (2002) Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do-II // ResearchTechnology Management. 45(6):43–49. DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2002.11671532.Cooper R.G. (1993) Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. 2nd ed / Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Cooper R.G. (1993) Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process from Idea to Launch. 2nd ed / Addison Wesley Publishing Company.Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (1998) Best Practices for Managing R&D Portfolios // Research-Technology Management. 41(4):20–33. DOI: 10.1080/08956308.1998.11671219.Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (1998) Best Practices for Managing R&D Portfolios // Research-Technology Management. 41(4):20–33. DOI: 10.1080/08956308.1998.11671219.Bhuiyan N. (2011) A framework for successful new product development // Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 4(4):746–770. DOI: 10.3926/jiem.334.Bhuiyan N. (2011) A framework for successful new product development // Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 4(4):746–770. DOI: 10.3926/jiem.334.Komarov A.V., Petrov A.N., Sartory A.V. (2018) The Model of Integrated Assessment of Technological Readiness of Innovative Scientific and Technological Projects //The Economics of Science. 4(1):47–57. DOI: 10.22394/2410–132X-2017-4-1-47-57.Komarov A.V., Petrov A.N., Sartory A.V. (2018) The Model of Integrated Assessment of Technological Readiness of Innovative Scientific and Technological Projects //The Economics of Science. 4(1):47–57. DOI: 10.22394/2410–132X-2017-4-1-47-57.Mankins J.C. (1995) Technology readiness levels / NASA, Office of Space Access and Technology, Advanced Concepts Office.Mankins J.C. (1995) Technology readiness levels / NASA, Office of Space Access and Technology, Advanced Concepts Office.Sauser B., Ramirez-Marquez J., Verma D., Gove R. (2006) From TRL to SRL: The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels, Stevens Institute of Technology, Paper #126.Sauser B., Ramirez-Marquez J., Verma D., Gove R. (2006) From TRL to SRL: The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels, Stevens Institute of Technology, Paper #126.Bakke K., Haskins C. (2018) Use of TRL in the systems engineering toolbox // INCOSE International Symposium. 28(1):587–601. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334–5837.2018.00502.x.Bakke K., Haskins C. (2018) Use of TRL in the systems engineering toolbox // INCOSE International Symposium. 28(1):587–601. DOI: 10.1002/j.2334–5837.2018.00502.x.Garg T., Eppinger S., Joglekar N., Olechowski A. (2017) Using TRLs and System Architecture to Estimate Technology Integration Risk / Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver. 3. Pp. 301–310.Garg T., Eppinger S., Joglekar N., Olechowski A. (2017) Using TRLs and System Architecture to Estimate Technology Integration Risk / Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED17). The University of British Columbia, Vancouver. 3. Pp. 301–310.Petrov A.N., Komarov A.V. (2020) Estimaton of technology readiness level of tender proposal in terms of methodology TPRL // The Economics of Science. 6(1–2):88–99. DOI: 10.22394/2410–132X-2020-6-1-2-88-99.Petrov A.N., Komarov A.V. (2020) Estimaton of technology readiness level of tender proposal in terms of methodology TPRL // The Economics of Science. 6(1–2):88–99. DOI: 10.22394/2410–132X-2020-6-1-2-88-99. (In Russ.)Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (2011) / U.S. Department of Defence.Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (2011) / U.S. Department of Defence.Fernandez J.A. (2010) Contextual role of TRLs and MRLs in technology management Sandia National Laboratories. DOI: 10.2172/1002093.Fernandez J.A. (2010) Contextual role of TRLs and MRLs in technology management Sandia National Laboratories. DOI: 10.2172/1002093.Technology Readiness Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Evaluating the Readiness of Technology for Use in Acquisition Programs and Projects (2020) / U.S. Government Accountability Office.Technology Readiness Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Evaluating the Readiness of Technology for Use in Acquisition Programs and Projects (2020) / U.S. Government Accountability Office.Комаров А.В., Комаров К.А., Шуртаков К.В. (2021) Использование методологии комплексной оценки научно-технологических проектов для оценки рисков их невыполнения // Экономика науки. Т. 7. № 1. С. 19-38.Komarov A.V., Komarov K.A., Shurtakov K.V. (2021) Risk Assessment of Scientific and Technological Projects with the Methodology of Integrated Assessment of Scientific and Technological Projects // The Economics of Science. 7(1):19–38. (In Russ.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.