ecnaЭкономика наукиEconomics of Science2410-132X2949-4680Delo Publishing houseecna-487Research ArticleЭКОНОМИКА ЗНАНИЙ И ТЕХНОЛОГИЙKNOWLEDGE ECONOMYЦенность знаний в эпоху экономики знанийThe Value of Knowledge in the Age of the Knowledge Economyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8754-0012ЕрохинВ. В.ErokhinV. V.

Ерохин Виктор Викторович –  доктор технических наук, доцент, профессор кафедры “Математические методы и бизнес-информатика”; профессор кафедры “Инновационное предпринимательство”,

Scopus Author ID: 57195330507.

143007, Московская обл., г. Одинцово, Можайское шоссе, д. 30-52.

Victor V. Erokhin –  Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Mathematical Methods and Business Informatics; Professor of the Department of Innovative Entrepreneurship,

52-30, Mozhaiskoe highway, Odintsovo, 143007, Moscow region.

Scopus Author ID: 57195330507.

erohinvv@mail.ruМосковский государственный институт (университет) международных отношений Министерства иностранных дел Российской Федерации; Московский государственный технический университет имени Н.Э. БауманаMoscow State Institute (University) of International Relations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Bauman Moscow State Technical University2025030320251113949Copyright © Ерохин В.В., 20252025Ерохин В.В.Erokhin V.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/487

В современном инфокоммуникационном и цифровом мире актуальным вопросом является не только стоимость инновационного товара или услуги, но и стоимость знания, которое также становиться в эпоху экономики знаний товаром. Определение более точных стоимостных показателей знания является актуальным направлением науки и бизнеса. Целью исследования является определить отличительные черты возникновения и существования эпохи экономики знаний, математически формализовать стоимость знания. Основным методом анализа является систематизация научных знаний в области экономики знаний. Результатами являются основные аспекты экономических и технологических отношений в социуме, порождающем эпоху экономики знаний, также определена стоимость знаний для открытой свободной рыночной экономики в зависимости от распространённости знаний, требуемого уровня познания знания, изменения комфортности жизни человека при использовании нового знания, инновационности знания, скорости создания новых инновационных знаний. Представлены аспекты влияния инфокоммуникационных сетей знаний на устойчивость производства. Растущая важность знаний в экономике страны и стран приравнивается к новой инновационной революции, основанной на компьютерных технологиях, цифровой инфраструктуре и высококвалифицированной рабочей силе. Инфокоммуникационные сети знаний рассматриваются как важный модуль решения энергетических проблем страны и стран. Эффективное управление знаниями и создание инфокоммуникационных сетей знаний являются главной стратегией современного успешного развития компании.

In today’s infocommunication and digital world, the value of knowledge has become as important as the cost of innovative products or services. Knowledge itself is now a commodity in the era of the knowledge economy. Accurately determining the cost of knowledge has emerged as a critical area of research for both science and business. This study aims to identify the distinctive features of the knowledge economy era and to mathematically formalize the cost of knowledge. The research employs a systematic analysis of scientific knowledge in the field of the knowledge economy. The results include a methodology for calculating the maximum cost of knowledge, which depends on several factors: the size of a realistic achievable market segment (SAM – Serviceable Available Market); the prevalence of knowledge in society’s educational sphere; the level of understanding required by the user; changes in the comfort of human life; the innovativeness of knowledge; and the speed at which new innovative knowledge is created. The study also explores the impact of infocommunication knowledge networks on production sustainability. It demonstrates that the growing importance of knowledge in national and global economies represents a new innovative revolution, driven by computer technology, digital infrastructure, and highly skilled labour. The key conclusion is that effective knowledge management and the development of infocommunication knowledge networks are essential strategies for the successful growth of modern companies.

инновацииоткрытая экономикаэкономика знанийпроизводственная функциястоимость знанияinnovationopen economyknowledge economyproduction functioncost of knowledgeReferencesСухарев, О. (2024a). «Эволюционная экономика»: возможности формирования политики роста и технологических изменений. Общество и экономика, (1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367624010012, EDN: WOXHIASukharev O. (2024a). “Evolutionary economics”: Possibilities for forming the policy of growth and technological changes. Society and Economics, (1), 5–25. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207367624010012Сухарев, О.С. (2024b). Измерение технологического развития: проблемы и способы их преодоления. Станкоинструмент, 3(36), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.22184/2499–9407.2024.36.3.26.32, EDN: GQBHTJSukharev O. S. (2024b). Measuring technological development: Problems and ways to overcome them. Stankoinstrument, 3(36), 26–33. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.22184/2499-9407.2024.36.3.26.32Сухарев, О.С. (2015). Информационная экономика: знание, конкуренция и рост. Москва: Финансы и статистика. EDN: YMBWQJSukharev O. S. (2015). Information economy: knowledge, competition and growth. Moscow: Finance and Statistics Publishing House.Arrow, K.J. (1999). Knowledge as a factor of production. In B. Pleskovic & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (pp. 15–20). World Bank.Arrow, K.J. (1999). Knowledge as a factor of production. In B. Pleskovic & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics (pp. 15–20). World Bank.Bontis, N., Ciambotti, M., Palazzi, F., & Sgrò, F. (2018). Intellectual capital and financial performance in social cooperative enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(4), 712–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2017-0049, EDN: YKCJTVBontis, N., Ciambotti, M., Palazzi, F., & Sgrò, F. (2018). Intellectual capital and financial performance in social cooperative enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(4), 712–731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2017-0049, EDN: YKCJTVBrown, J., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116Brown, J., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116Choucri, N., & Agarwal, G. (2022). Analytics for cybersecurity policy of cyber-physical systems. 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HST56032.2022.10025438Choucri, N., & Agarwal, G. (2022). Analytics for cybersecurity policy of cyber-physical systems. 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HST56032.2022.10025438Clark, G. (2014). The industrial revolution. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 2, pp. 217–262). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00005–8Clark, G. (2014). The industrial revolution. In P. Aghion & S. N. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 2, pp. 217–262). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53538-2.00005–8Coyle, D. (1998). The Weightless World: Strategies for Managing the Digital Economy. MIT Press.Coyle, D. (1998). The Weightless World: Strategies for Managing the Digital Economy. MIT Press.Coyle, D., & Manley, A. (2024). What is the value of data? A review of empirical methods. Journal of Economic Surveys, 38(4), 1317–1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12585Coyle, D., & Manley, A. (2024). What is the value of data? A review of empirical methods. Journal of Economic Surveys, 38(4), 1317–1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12585Dosi, G., Marengo, L., & Virgillito, M. (2021). Hierarchies, knowledge, and power inside organizations. Strategy Science, 6(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0136, EDN: SOZKDCDosi, G., Marengo, L., & Virgillito, M. (2021). Hierarchies, knowledge, and power inside organizations. Strategy Science, 6(4), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2021.0136, EDN: SOZKDCKogut, B. (2010). Knowledge, information, rules, and structures (pp. 77–94). In: Itami, H., Kusunoki, K., Numagami, T., Takeishi, A. (eds) Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04480-9_4Kogut, B. (2010). Knowledge, information, rules, and structures (pp. 77–94). In: Itami, H., Kusunoki, K., Numagami, T., Takeishi, A. (eds) Dynamics of Knowledge, Corporate Systems and Innovation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04480-9_4Landes, D.S. (2003). The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819957Landes, D.S. (2003). The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819957Lee, C-C., Yeh, W.- C., Yu, Z., et al. (2023). Knowledge sharing and innovation performance: A case study on the impact of organizational culture, structural capital, human resource management practices, and relational capital of real estate agents. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 707. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02185-w, EDN: AZJOJELee, C-C., Yeh, W.- C., Yu, Z., et al. (2023). Knowledge sharing and innovation performance: A case study on the impact of organizational culture, structural capital, human resource management practices, and relational capital of real estate agents. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 707. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02185-w, EDN: AZJOJELundvall, B. (2022). National systems of innovation. Chapter 43 In C. Antonelli (Ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia on the Economics of Knowledge and Innovation (pp. 350–357). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106996.00048Lundvall, B. (2022). National systems of innovation. Chapter 43 In C. Antonelli (Ed.), Elgar Encyclopedia on the Economics of Knowledge and Innovation (pp. 350–357). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106996.00048Mohaghegh, F., Zaim, H., Dzenopoljac, V., Dzenopoljac, A., & Bontis, N. (2024). Analyzing the effects of knowledge management on organizational performance through knowledge utilization and sustainability. Knowledge and Process Management, 31(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1777, EDN: NTAKCEMohaghegh, F., Zaim, H., Dzenopoljac, V., Dzenopoljac, A., & Bontis, N. (2024). Analyzing the effects of knowledge management on organizational performance through knowledge utilization and sustainability. Knowledge and Process Management, 31(3), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1777, EDN: NTAKCENeef, D.G., Siesfeld, A., Cefola, J. (1998). The Economic Impact of Knowledge. Butterworth-Heinemann (1st edition). Routledge.Neef, D.G., Siesfeld, A., Cefola, J. (1998). The Economic Impact of Knowledge. Butterworth-Heinemann (1st edition). Routledge.Ramirez, R., & Choucri, N. (2016). Improving interdisciplinary communication with standardized cyber security terminology: A literature review. IEEE Access, 4, 2216–2243. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2544381, EDN: WSHEYJRamirez, R., & Choucri, N. (2016). Improving interdisciplinary communication with standardized cyber security terminology: A literature review. IEEE Access, 4, 2216–2243. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2544381, EDN: WSHEYJRegnér, P., & Zander, U. (2014). International strategy and knowledge creation: The advantage of foreignness and liability of concentration. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–8551.12054, EDN: UUUWNJRegnér, P., & Zander, U. (2014). International strategy and knowledge creation: The advantage of foreignness and liability of concentration. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–8551.12054, EDN: UUUWNJRikap, C., & Lundvall, B. (2022). Big tech, knowledge predation and the implications for development. Innovation and Development, 12(3), 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1855825, EDN: YGHNOTRikap, C., & Lundvall, B. (2022). Big tech, knowledge predation and the implications for development. Innovation and Development, 12(3), 389–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1855825, EDN: YGHNOTSaadet, N., & Karadenizli, S. (2024). The effects of knowledge and knowledge sharing on innovativeness. In Reference Module in Social Sciences. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13701-3.00132-8Saadet, N., & Karadenizli, S. (2024). The effects of knowledge and knowledge sharing on innovativeness. In Reference Module in Social Sciences. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-13701-3.00132-8Shapiro, C., & Varian, H.R. (1998). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business Review Press.Shapiro, C., & Varian, H.R. (1998). Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Harvard Business Review Press.Stearns, P.N. (2013). The Industrial Revolution in World History (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494475Stearns, P.N. (2013). The Industrial Revolution in World History (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494475Sukharev, O.S. (2020). Technological development in the knowledge economy. Proceedings of the 2nd Virtual International Conference Path to a Knowledge Society-Managing Risks and Innovation. Serbia, Niš, November 16–17, 2020 (pp. 17–21).Sukharev, O.S. (2020). Technological development in the knowledge economy. Proceedings of the 2nd Virtual International Conference Path to a Knowledge Society-Managing Risks and Innovation. Serbia, Niš, November 16–17, 2020 (pp. 17–21).Sukharev, O.S. (2023). The knowledge economy and technology bubble in the IT sector. Proceedings of the 5th Virtual International Conference Path to a Knowledge Society-Managing Risks and Innovation Serbia, Niš, October 23-24, 2023. (pp. 105–110).Sukharev, O.S. (2023). The knowledge economy and technology bubble in the IT sector. Proceedings of the 5th Virtual International Conference Path to a Knowledge Society-Managing Risks and Innovation Serbia, Niš, October 23-24, 2023. (pp. 105–110).Sun, Y., Liu, J., & Ding, Y. (2019). Analysis of the relationship between open innovation, knowledge management capability and dual innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1632431Sun, Y., Liu, J., & Ding, Y. (2019). Analysis of the relationship between open innovation, knowledge management capability and dual innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1632431Yildiz, H., Murtic, A., Klofsten, M., Zander, U., & Richtnér, A. (2021). Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective. Technovation, 99, 102130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102130Yildiz, H., Murtic, A., Klofsten, M., Zander, U., & Richtnér, A. (2021). Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective. Technovation, 99, 102130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102130

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.