Analysis of Requirements for Academic Staff at Higher Education Institutions
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-3-205-216
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyse the modern requirements for the teaching staff. The article examines the regulatory requirements for various positions of the teaching staff, analyses 338 vacancies of Russian universities on one of the largest job search sites and the most relevant domestic and foreign research on this topic. The methodological basis of the study is the results of monitoring and analysis of regulatory requirements for the teaching staff and current research on the designated topic, as well as the results of content analysis of current vacancies for 35 qualification and competency requirements, depending on the position on the search site work “hh.ru”. As a result of the study, the author was able to identify the most relevant requirements of various stakeholders to the teaching staff. The results of the study can be used by university leaders to improve activities related to assessing the quality of employees, by candidates for faculty positions in order to identify individual points of growth, and can also serve as a basis for further research in this area.
About the Author
E. M. Trapeznikova
Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena M. Trapeznikova – post-graduate student, assistant of the Department of International marketing and trade
690014, Vladivostok, street Gogol, 41
References
1. Gaibnazarova Z.T. (2017) Improving the higher education system is the main factor in the formation of human capital // Scientific and analytical journal Science and Practice of the Russian University of Economics G.V. Plekhanov. 2017; 3:72–78.
2. Norova F.F. (2020) Assessment of the quality of education in universities // Science, education and culture. 2020; 8:52.
3. GOST 52614.2–2006 (2007) Guidelines for the application of GOST R ISO 9001–2001 in the field of education / Techexpert. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200048378.
4. Brinkley-Etzkorn K.E. (2018) Learning to teach online: Measuring the influence of faculty development training on teaching effectiveness through a TPACK lens // The Internet and Higher Education. 2018; 38:28–35.
5. Dollinger M., Lodge J., Coates H. (2018) Co-creation in higher education: Towards a conceptual model // Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2018; 28(2):210–231.
6. Gluzman N.A. (2017) The category of professionalism in the preparation of a future teacher // International Research Journal. 2017; 11–2:65.
7. Vasilieva E.Yu. (2006) Approaches to assessing the quality of a university teacher // University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2006; 2:74–78.
8. Klimuk V.V., Komarov O.E. (2016) Methodology for assessing the quality of work of the teaching staff of universities // Bulletin of the South-Russian state technical University (NPI) Series Socio-economic Sciences. 2016; 5:107–114.
9. Trubilin A.I., Grigorash O.V. (2011) The system for assessing the quality of the activities of teachers and the department of the university // Economics of Education. 2011; 2:19–23.
10. Grigorash O.V. (2014) On the indicators for assessing the effectiveness of universities // Polythematic network electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 2014; 95:1237–1262.
11. Sharipov F.V. (2010) Professional competence of a university teacher // Higher Education Today. 2010; 1:72–77.
12. Anitsyna T.M., Astapenko E.L., Budnikova V.S., Gendina N.I., Zhukova T.D., Ivanova E.V., Moskvichyova N.P. (2011) On making changes in the unified qualification directory of offices of managers, specialists and employees, section “Qualification characteristics of offices of educational” // Bulletin of Education of Russia. 2011; 15:66.
13. Strielkovski V., Kiseleva L.S., Popova E.N. (2018) Determinants of the quality of university education: student opinion // Integration of Education. 2018; 22(2):91.
14. Esteban C.M.R., Cerro J.S. (2020) Teaching quality: The satisfaction of university students with their professors. Anales de Psicología // Annals of Psychology. 2020; 36(2):304–312.
15. Basow S.A., Phelan J.E., Capotosto L. (2006) Gender patterns in college students’ choic-es of their best and worst professors // Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2006; 30(1):25–35.
16. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No 1662-r dated 17.11.2008 (2008) / The concept of long-term economic development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020 / ConsultantPlus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_82134/28c7f9e359e8af09d7244d8033c66928fa27e527.
17. Szromek A.R., Wolniak, R. (2020) Job satisfaction and problems among academic staff in higher education // Sustainability. 2020; 12(12):4865.
Review
For citations:
Trapeznikova E.M. Analysis of Requirements for Academic Staff at Higher Education Institutions. Economics of Science. 2021;7(3):205-216. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2021-7-3-205-216
Views:
422
Email this article 