PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL PROJECT'S EXECUTIVE TEAM
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-3-4-250-261
Abstract
The article offers a method to evaluate the performance of executive managers teams involved in scientific-technical projects, which considers a range of factors allowing the team to reach applied targets. Within this methdology framework for evaluating the readiness of an innovative scientific-technical project, such method can be utilized for defining the team's ability to match the requirements level of the planned or already realized project. Applying suggested method will allow formulating recommendations for the development of the project team, that will lead to eliminating risks in failing to reach set targets. The methodology has been approved for federal budget programme «Research and Development in priority areas of the scientific-technical complex in Russia for 2014–2020 years».
About the Authors
A. V. Komarov
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
M. A. Slepcova
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
E. V. Chechetkin
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
K. V. Shurtakov
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
M. V. Tret'jakova
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
References
1. Mankins J. C. (1995) Technology readiness levels / Advanced Concepts Office of Space Access and 1995. https://www.colorado.edu/ASEN/asen3036/TECHNOLOGYREADINESSLEVELS.pdf.
2. Automotive Technology and Manufacturing Readiness Levels (2014) A guide to recognised stages of development within the Automotive Industry 2011. http://www.apcuk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Automotive-Technology-and-Manufacturing-Readiness-Levels.pdf.
3. Bockenheimer C. (2010) The Airbus SHM Development Process // 2nd International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace. З. We.4. A.2.
4. Petrov A.N., Sartory A. V., Filimonov A. V. (2016) Comprehensive assessment of the status scientific and technical projects using Technology Project Readiness Level // The Economics of Science. V. 2. № . 4. P. 244–260.
5. Vikulov O.V., Buharin S. N., Divueva N. A. (2014) A typical technological process of conducting scientific-technical expertise, completed in Federal-StateScientific Institution called «Scientific-research Institute – Republican research scientific-consulting expertise center // Innovation Theory and Expertise. № 2 (13). P. 101–114.
6. Sotavov А.К. (2016) Evaluating scientific-technical level of innovation projects: organizational – managerial aspect // Izvestia Saint Petersburg State University of Economics. № 2 (98). P. 126–130.
7. Katsenbah D., Smit D. (2013) Teamwork approach: a creation of a highly efficient organization (translation from English by I. Evstigneeva, edited by P. Suvorov). Мoscow: Alpina Pablisher. 374 p.
8. Belbin R. (2003) Meredith. The types of roles in the managers’ teams. Мoscow: HIPPO. 232 p.
9. Adizes I. (2011) Leaders' development. How to understand your management style and effectively communicate with other management style owners (Translation from English). Мoscow: Alpina Pablisher. 259 p.
10. Khoreva L.V. (1994) Applying multiple criteria evaluation method to assess the success of scientific group's activity and its relevance // Sociology: methodology, methods, and mathematical modeli. № 3–4. P. 44–54.
11. Order of Russian Ministry of Labour dated 21 August 1998 № 37 (1998) On establishing Classification reference book of executives', experts,' and other specialists’ roles titles / Garant. http://base.garant.ru/180107/#ixzz4ziVG8fcH.
Review
For citations:
Komarov A.V., Slepcova M.A., Chechetkin E.V., Shurtakov K.V., Tret'jakova M.V. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC-TECHNICAL PROJECT'S EXECUTIVE TEAM. Economics of Science. 2017;3(4):250-261. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-3-4-250-261
Views:
904
Email this article 