METHODICAL APPROACH TO THE FORMATION OF RUBRICATORS-ADAPTER FOR ANALYSIS OF WEB OF SCIENCE AND SCOPUS AREA IN TERMS OF PRIORITIES THE STRATEGY OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

The article describes a methodical approach to the development of Web of Science and Scopus rubricators-adapter in the system of priorities of the Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation. The relevance of this problem is due to the need for statistical and dynamic retrospective, prospective and bidirectional studies. The article presents the description of the hierarchical Web of Science and Scopus categories structures and their classification codes. Revealed the difficulty of categories correlating among themselves and in the system of priorities SSTD. The principles of categories-adapters formation in the priorities SSTD context. Article is presented the algorithm of rubricators-adapters Web of Science and Scopus formation in the system of SSTD priorities. The algorithm of number scientific articles distribution on scientific categories in system of SNTR priorities by grouping method is presented. A comparative analysis of Russian Federation scientific categories and the world in the number of scientific articles indexed in the Web of Science or Scopus, in the system of SSTD priorities.

1. Order of The President of the Russian Federation dated 1 December 2016 № 642 (2016) Strategy of scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation / Official website of the Russian President. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/ bank/41449.

2. Philosophical Encyclopaedic Dictionary (1983) / Ch. Ed. L.F. Ilyichev, P.N. Fedoseev, S.M. Kovalev, V.G. Panov. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia. 840 p.

3. Shreider Yu.A. (1973) Classification logic // Scientific and technical information. Series 1. № 51. P. 3–7.

4. Ponkin I.V. (2017) Classification as a method of scientific research, in particular in legal science // Bulletin of Perm University. Juridical sciences. Issue 37. P. 249–259.

5. Rozova S.S. (1986) Classification problem in modern science. Novosibirsk: Science. 224 р.

6. Orlov А.I. (2014) Mathematical Methods of Classification Theory // Scientific Journal of KubSU. № 01 (095). P. 423–459.

7. Web of Science (2018) Web of Knowledge. http://apps.webofknowledge.com.

8. Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators (2012) OECD, 27.02.2012. https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/38235147.pdf.

9. Scopus (2018) Scopus. https://www.scopus.com.

10. Sokolova N.Yu. (2016) New possibilities of domestic universal classifications (on the example of the BBK) // Bibliosphere. № 4. P. 112–115.

11. Turbina О.А., Savelieva О.А. (2006) Principle of classification of textual links // Bulletin of South Ural State University. № 6. Series: Linguistics. Issue. 3. P. 53–59.

12. Dolgova V.N., Medvedeva T.Yu. (2017) Statistics: textbook and practical work for bachelors – 2 nd ed., Pererab. and additional. / Moscow: Publishing House Yurayt. 627 p.

13. Stages of statistical research: primary processing of statistical observation results (2005) / HSE. https://www.hse.ru/data/415/588/1239/ lect2ec2005.pdf.

14. Kholmova K.K., Kharkov O.A., Grzybovsky A.M. (2016) Classification of scientific research in public health // Human ecology. № 1. P. 57–64.