The nationalization of the scientific and technological sphere of the Russian Federation: problems and consequences
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2018-4-3-164-174
Abstract
It is noted that the interim results of the achieved structural changes and the level of technological renewal of the Russian economy make it relevant to reassess the effectiveness of innovative practices and models used in the Russian Federation. The basic provisions of modern science and technology policy are analyzed. The absence of a direct dependence of the level of scientific and technological development of the country on the level of development of the national research and development sector is substantiated. It was recommended to develop a set of measures of modern science and technology policy aimed at reducing the nationalization of the scientific and technological sphere and targeting large and medium-sized companies in the real sector of the economy as the main subjects of the «technological breakthrough».
About the Author
N. G. Kurakova
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Prospect Vernadskogo, 82, Moscow, 119571
Russian Federation
Prospect Vernadskogo, 82, Moscow, 119571
References
1. The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation (2018) / Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2018.pdf.
2. Rating of the leading countries of the world on the cost of science (2017) / ISSEK HSE. https://issek.hse.ru/news/221864403.html.
3. On industrial production in 2017 (2017) / Federal State Statistics Service. http://www.gks.ru/ bgd/free/B04_03/IssWWW.exe/Stg/d03/7.htm.
4. Atkinson R.D. (2017) A New Era in U.S. R&D Policy? Explaining the Decline In U.S. Government R&D Intensity. https://www.itif.org/node/7335.
5. National Technology Initiative (2018) / NTI. http://www.nti2035.ru/nti.
6. Presidential address to The Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation dated 4 December 2014 (2014) Transcript / Official website of the President of Russia. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/47173.
7. Peskov D.N. (2015) National Technology Initiative: Objectives, Basic Principles and Achieved Results / Meeting of the Presidium of the Presidential Council for Economic Modernization and Innovative Development of Russia. Report, 09.06.2015. http://static.government.ru/media/files/T9Crayp8PsBQU6hdVAl0SsDlu2XvCvYG.pdf.
8. Petrov А.N., Kurakova N.G. (2018) The risks of implementing genomic research programmes in the Russian Federation // The Economics of Science. V. 4. № 2. P. 84–94.
9. Yeremchenko О.А., Cherchenko О.V. (2018) Factors of technological development and re-industrialization of traditional industrial sectors // The Economics of Science. V. 4. № 2. P. 95–114.
10. Zinov V.G., Tsvetkova L.А. (2018) Regularities in the formation of the competitive landscape of the emerging high-tech markets // The Economics of Science. V. 4. № 2. P. 127–142.
11. Zabello Ja. (2010) Lessons from the first: How BASF and DuPont succeed // SIBUR today. http://www.up-pro.ru/library/strategy/management/basf-dupont-yroki-pervyh.html.
12. Japan. Scientific and Technological Development (2018) / Innnovations. Investments. http://investicii-innovacii.ru/YAponiya.–Nauchno-tehnologicheskoe-razvitie-693.html.
13. Tsvetkova L.А. (2016) Model of accelerating the life cycle of research and development on the example of the development of technologies for genetic reprogramming of cells // The Economics of Science. V. 2. № 3. P. 184–194.
14. Directoryofcompanies(2018)/AgroInvestor. http://www.agroinvestor.ru/companies/a-z/syngenta.
15. The United States approved the deal to buy ChemChina Swiss Syngenta for $43 billion (2016) / Prime, 22.08.2016. https://1prime.ru/industry_and_energy/20160822/826403278.html.
16. Mukhamedzyanova D. (2017) How an open innovation strategy turns Bayer into an IT company / Hi-Tech, 12.09.2017. https://hightech.fm/2017/09/12/Bayer.
17. How Putin can restore Russian research (2018) // Nature, 2018. 555, р. 285–286. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586–018–03066-y.
18. Schiermeier Q. (2018) Russian science chases escape from mediocrity // Nature. 555, р. 297–298. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-02872-8.
19. Science and Engineering indicators 2018 (2018)/ NSF. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/assets/nsb20181.pdf.
20. Kurakov F.А. (2018) Russia in the global scientific and technological ecosystem: 2016–2017 // The Economics of Science. V. 4. № 1. P. 20–29.
21. The 2017 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (2017) / EU. http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard17.html#close.
22. Will Stronger Borders Weaken Innovation? (2017) / PWC. https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/media/file/2017-Global-Innovation-1000-Fact-Pack.pdf.
23. Domestic costs of research and development in the Russian Federation: an increase is expected (2018) / ISSEK HSE. https://issek.hse.ru/news/223708440.html.
24. Science, technology, innovation. Newsletter (2017) / ISSEK HSE. https://issek.hse.ru/data/2017/11/02/1158438166/NTI_N_71_02112017.pdf.
25. Science and Commerce (2018) / Kommersant, 13.08.2018. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3712714.
26. Andrushchak G.V., Artemov S.V. et al. (2017) National Report on Innovations in Russia – 2017 / RVC. http://www.rvc.ru/upload/iblock/c64/RVK_innovation_2017.pdf.
27. Draft Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation (2018) On the procedure for the development and implementation of comprehensive scientific and technical programs and projects of the full innovation cycle in order to ensure the implementation of the priorities of the scientific and technological development of the Russian Federation.
28. Venture Pulse Q4 2017 Report (2018) / KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2018/01/venture-pulse-report-q4–17. pdf.
29. MoneyTree Report Q4 2017 (2017) / PwC, CB Insights. http://keiretsuforum-midatlantic.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/cb-insights_moneytree-q4–2017.pdf.
30. The 2017 Global CVC Report (2017) / CB Insights. https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/corporate-venture-capital-trends-2017.
31. Science, technology, innovation (2018) Newsletter / ISSEK HSE, 26.06.2018. https://issek.hse.ru/data/2018/06/27/1153268913/NTI_N_90_27062018.pdf.
32. Pen Е. (2018) In Russia in 2017 the number of patent applications for inventions fell to the level of 2006 / VC, 23.03.2018. https://vc.ru/35181v-rossii-za-2017-god-kolichestvo-zayavok-napatenty-izobreteniy-upalo-do-urovnya-2006-g.
33. Innovative activity of industrial production organizations (2017) / ISSEK HSE, 15.11.2017. https://issek.hse.ru/news/211863985.html.
Review
For citations:
Kurakova N.G. The nationalization of the scientific and technological sphere of the Russian Federation: problems and consequences. Economics of Science. 2018;4(3):164-174. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2018-4-3-164-174
Views:
650
Email this article 