Экономика науки

Расширенный поиск

Decision Making in Organizations: Intuition, Information, and Religiosity

Полный текст:


Previous research in experimental psychology suggests that religious belief is influenced by one’s general tendency to rely on intuition rather than information. A corollary emerging from this based on balance theory is that managers who are religious might make more intuition-based decisions than their counterparts who are not religious. The latter group might tend to make more information-based decisions. Recent research also indicates that the use of scientific method, a close cousin of information-based decision making, triggers moral behavior. Employing critical incident technique, the present researchers test this potential relationship among business executives at various ranks, various cultural contexts, and holding various religious beliefs. Our analysis indicates that theist managers, both gnostic and agnostic, preferred intuitive decision making. Likewise, both gnostic and agnostic atheist managers preferred information-based decision making. Also, atheist managers articulated better logical explanations as to why their decisions were morally correct.

Об авторе

В. George
Christian Brothers University
Соединённые Штаты Америки

George Babu – PhD, DBA, EdS, Associate Dean and Professor of Management

Tennessee 38104, Memphis, 650 East Parkway South

Scopus Author ID: 10040491200

Список литературы

1. Allinson C. W., Hayes J. (1996) The Cognitive Style Index: A Measure of Intuition-Analysis For Organizational Research // Journal of Management Studies. 33(1):119–135. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00801.x.

2. Taggart W., Valenzi E. (1990) Assessing rational and intuitive styles: a human information processing metaphor // Journal of Management Studies. 27(2):149–172. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1990.tb00758.x.

3. Robey D., Taggart W. (1981) Measuring managers’ minds: The assessment of style in human information processing // The Academy of Management Review. 6(3):375–383.

4. Khatri N., Ng H. A. (2000) The role of intuition in strategic decision making // Human relations. 53(1):57–86.

5. Schwartz T. (2010) Be Excellent at Anything. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.

6. Dane E., Pratt M. G. (2007) Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. // Academy of management review. 32(1):33–54.

7. Bering J. M. (2011) The belief instinct: The psychology of souls, destiny, and the meaning of life. New York, NY: Norton.

8. Hodgkinson G. P., Sadler-Smith E., Burke L. A., Claxton G., Sparrow P. R. (2009) Intuition in Organizations: Implications for Strategic Management // Long Range Planning. 42(3):277–297. DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.05.003.

9. Shenhav A., Rand D. G., Greene J. D. (2012) Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 141(3):423–437.

10. Evans J. S. B.T. (2008) Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition // Annual Review of Psychology. 59:255–278. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629.

11. Heider F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley & Sons.

12. Woodside A. G., Chebat J. C. (2001) Updating Heider’s balance theory in consumer behavior: A Jewish couple buys a German car and additional buying–consuming transformation stories // Psychology & Marketing. 18(5):475–495.

13. Spilka B., Hood R. W., Hunsberger B., Gorsuch R. (2003) The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. Guilford Press. Retrieved from

14. Wright H. W. (1909) Religion and Morality // International Journal of Ethics. 20(1):87–92. DOI:10.2307/2376978.

15. Wainwright W. J. (2005) Religion and morality. Ashgate. Retrieved from

16. Ma-Kellams C., Blascovich J. (2013) Does “science” make you moral? The effects of priming science on moral judgments and behavior // PLoS ONE. 8(3), e57989. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0057989.

17. Keller A. C., Smith K. T., Smith L. M. (2007) Do gender, educational level, religiosity, and work experience affect the ethical decision-making of US accountants? // Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 18(3):299–314.

18. Lau R. R., Redlawsk D. P. (2001) Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making // American Journal of Political Science. Pp. 951–971.

19. Hilary G., Hui K. W. (2009) Does religion matter in corporate decision making in America? // Journal of Financial Economics. 93(3):455–473.

20. Miller A. (2000) Going to hell in Asia: the relationship between risk and religion in a cross-cultural setting // Review of Religious Research. 40:5–18.

21. Parboteeah K. P., Hoegl M., Cullen J. B. (2008) Ethics and religion: An empirical test of a multidimensional model // Journal of business ethics. 80(2):387–398.

22. Ruth-Sahd L.A., Hendy H. M. (2005) Predictors of novice nurses’ use of intuition to guide patient care decisions // Journal of Nursing Education. 44(10):450–458.

23. Cavanagh G. F., Hazen M. A. (2008) Sustainability, spirituality, and discernment or discernment upholds sustainability / In Biberman, J. and Tischler, L. (Eds), Spirituality in Business: Theory, Practice, and Future Directions, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY. Pp. 35–50.

24. Daws R. E., Hampshire A. (2017) The negative relationship between reasoning and religiosity is underpinned by a bias for intuitive responses specifically when intuition and logic are in conflict // Frontiers in Psychology. 8:2191.

25. Ecklund E. H., Scheitle C. P. (2007) Religion among academic scientists: Distinctions, disciplines, and demographics // Social Problems. 54(2):289–307.

26. Lucey K. G. (2015) Essay# 21: Taxonomies & Teaching. In Pesky Essays on the Logic of Philosophy (Pp. 211–217). Springer International Publishing.

27. Dawkins R. (2016). The god delusion. Random House.

28. Zuckerman P. (2007) Atheism: Contemporary rates and patterns. In M. Martin (Ed.), Cambridge companion to atheism (Pp. 47–68). Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press. DOI:10.1017/CCOL0521842700.004.

29. Sherkat D. E. (2008) Beyond belief: atheism, agnosticism, and theistic certainty in the United States // Sociological Spectrum. 28(5):438–459. DOI:10.1080/02732170802205932.

30. Wilson D. S. (2002) Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion, and the nature of society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

31. Aarnio K., Lindeman M. (2007) Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different? // Journal of Individual Differences. 28(1):1–9.

32. Garrett R. K., Weeks B. E. (2017) Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation // PLoS ONE. 12(9):37–50.

33. Lindeman M., Svedholm‐Häkkinen A.M. (2016) Does Poor Understanding of Physical World Predict Religious and Paranormal Beliefs? // Applied Cognitive Psychology. 30(5):736–742.

34. Saribay S. A., Yilmaz O. (2017) Analytic cognitive style and cognitive ability differentially predict religiosity and social conservatism // Personality and Individual Differences. 114:24–29.

35. Drive M. (2007) A “Spiritual Turn” in Organizational Studies: Meaning Making or Meaningless? // Journal of management, spirituality & religion. 4(1):56–86.

36. Dyck B. (2014) God on management: The world’s largest religions, the “theological turn,” and organization and management theory and practice. In Religion and organization theory (Pp. 23–62). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Для цитирования:

George В. Decision Making in Organizations: Intuition, Information, and Religiosity. Экономика науки. 2020;6(3):152-158.

For citation:

George B. Decision Making in Organizations: Intuition, Information, and Religiosity. The Economics of Science. 2020;6(3):152-158. (In Russ.)

Просмотров: 199

Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2410-132X (Print)