Using Metrics of Readiness Levels in Maturity Assessment of a Product or Technology for Application in JSCo “RZD”
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-1-31-45
Abstract
The article is devoted to the methods for maturity assessment of an innovative product or technology for implementation at the enterprises of JSCo “RZD” and assessing the risks of not achieving the readiness level of innovative projects. The main principles, scope and effects of using methods are noted.
The method was developed for JSCo “RZD” and based on the TPRL methodology for a complex assessment of the technological project readiness level with the improvement of the procedure, rules and the mathematical model of assessment in accordance with the management processes in the railway industry. Approbation of the proposed assessment methods was carried out on the examples of promising innovative proposals received by the “SingleWindow of Innovations of JSCo “RZD”.
The methods can be used for: a) assessing the level of technology development in JSCo “RZD” and comparing the level of technological development of the Russian Railways holding with foreign analogue companies; b) making a management decision on financing a development project, or on purchasing an innovative product and (or) technology and introducing it into the production process of JSCo “RZD”; c) building and verifying a product (technology) development and implementation roadmaps; d) monitoring the implementation of a project for the development and implementation of a product (technology), etc.
The application of the methods will improve the efficiency of innovation activities in JSCo “RZD”.
About the Authors
A. V. TulupovRussian Federation
Andrey V. Tulupov – Deputy Head
107078, Moscow, Kalanchevskaya str., 15
I. P. Vasiliev
Russian Federation
Ivan P. Vasiliev – Leading expert
107078, Moscow, Kalanchevskaya str., 15
D. A. Ionov
Russian Federation
Denis A. Ionov – Deputy Head of Division
107078, Moscow, Kalanchevskaya str., 15
E. V. Palatkina
Russian Federation
Elena V. Palatkina – Head of Division
107078, Moscow, Kalanchevskaya str., 15
A. N. Petrov
Russian Federation
Andrey N. Petrov – Head of Analytical Research Department
Scopus Author ID: 7401780289
123557, Moscow, Presnensky Val str., 19, bldg. 1
E. V. Chechetkin
Russian Federation
Еvgeniy V. Chechetkin – Chief Specialist of the Department of Statistics, Evaluation and Forecast
Scopus Author ID: 57209973765
123557, Moscow, Presnensky Val str., 19, bldg. 1
References
1. Sadin S.R., Povinelli F.P., Rosen R. (1989) The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems // Acta Astronautica. 1989; 20:3–77.
2. Mankins J.C. (1995) Technology readiness levels / Advanced Concepts Office of Space Access and 1995. http://www.artemisinnovation.com/images/TRL_White_Paper_2004-Edited.pdf.
3. Technology Readiness Assessment Guide. Best Practices for Evaluating the Readiness of Technology for Use in Acquisition Programs and Projects (GAO-20–48G) (2020) / U.S. Government Accountability Office, 07.01.2020.
4. Technology Readiness Level: Guidance Principles for Renewable Energy technologies. Final Report (2017) / European Commission. EUR27988 EN. November 2017.
5. ISO 16290:2013 (2013) Space systems – Definition of the Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) and their criteria of assessment.
6. GOST R56861–2016. Life cycle management system. Development of the product concept and technologies. General provisions (2016) / Tekhekspert. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200132491. (In Russ.)
7. GOST R57194.1–2016. Technology transfer. General provisions (2016) / Tekhekspert. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200141164. (In Russ.)
8. GOST R58048–2017. Technology transfer. Guidelines for assessing the level of technology maturity (2017) / Tekhekspert. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200158331. (In Russ.)
9. GOST ISO/IEC17000–2012 Conformity assessment. Dictionary and general principles (2012) / Tekhekspert. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200100949. (In Russ.)
10. Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL) Deskbook (2011) / U.S. Department of Defense. https://www.dodmrl.com/.
11. Guidelines for comparing the level of technological development and the values of key performance indicators of joint-stock companies with state participation, state corporations, state-owned companies and federal state unitary enterprises with the level of development and indicators of leading peer companies (2017) / Ministry of Economic Development of Russia. (In Russ.)
12. Nolte W., Kruse R. (2011) Readiness Level Proliferation / AFRL. https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2011/system/13132_NolteWednesday.pdf.
13. Rail Industry Readiness Levels (RIRLs) defined and explained (2019) / Rail Engineer, 09.02.2019. https://www.railengineer.co.uk/rail-industry-readiness-levels-rirls-defined-and-explained.
14. Product Acceptance Service. Guidance Note (2020) / Network Rail Limited, The Rail Industry Readiness Level. https://www.networkrail.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Product-Acceptance-Service-Technical-Services-Guidance-Notev4.2-Oct-2020.pdf.
15. Petrov A.N., Sartory A.V., Filimonov A.V. (2016) Comprehensive assessment of the status scientific and technical projects using Technology Project Readiness Level // The Economics of Science. 2016; 2(4): 244–260. (In Russ.)
16. Komarov А.V., Petrov А.N., Sartory А.V. (2018) The model of integrated assessment of technological readiness of innovative scientific and technological projects // The Economics of Science. 2018; 4(1): 47–57. (In Russ.)
17. Petrov A.N., Komarov А.V. (2020) stimaton of technology readiness level of tender proposal in terms of methodology TPRL // The Economics of Science. 2020; 6(1–2): 88–99. (In Russ.)
18. Single window of innovations for receiving innovative promising proposals that can be applied in the interests of JSCo “RZD” (2022) / RZD. https://eoi.rzd.ru/front. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Tulupov A.V., Vasiliev I.P., Ionov D.A., Palatkina E.V., Petrov A.N., Chechetkin E.V. Using Metrics of Readiness Levels in Maturity Assessment of a Product or Technology for Application in JSCo “RZD”. Economics of Science. 2022;8(1):31-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-1-31-45