Method for Assessing the Impact of Creating a New Industrial Infrastructure on the Industrial and Socio-Economic Development of Regions
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-1-46-57
Abstract
The article presents the results of a study that substantiates the effectiveness of creating new industrial enterprises based on clusters, industrial parks and technology parks in the regions of Russia for their development. The authors proposed a method that allows using authoritative national ratings and the author’s rating of the regional new industrial infrastructure to quantify the impact of the creation of new industrial enterprises in the region on the socio-economic situation of the regions and their environmental situation. The advantages of the method include its reliability and objectivity, information security. As a result, the conclusions are substantiated: the created technology parks, clusters and industrial parks play a significant role for the development of the industry of the regions, improving the environmental situation and accelerating socio-economic development, but the process of creating industrial enterprises using a new industrial infrastructure requires intensification. The results obtained will contribute to solving the problem of measuring the effectiveness of the development and functioning of regional industrial systems.
Keywords
new economy,
subject of the federation,
target efficiency,
regional production system,
statistical indicators of efficiency
Supporting agencies: The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research within the framework of the scientific project No. 20-010-00330.
About the Authors
T. A. Burtseva
Russian Technological University – MIREA
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tatyana A. Burtseva – Professor
119454, Moscow, Vernadsky pr., 78
A. R. Akhmadov
Ministry of Finance of the Chechen Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aslan A. Akhmadov – Chief Specialist-Expert of the Budget Planning and Forecasting Department
364061, Grozny, Garajnaya Str., 2a
References
1. Burtseva T.A., Savelyev A.A. (2017) Efficiency of creation of industrial parks in the regions of Russia // Regional Economics and Management: electronic scientific journal. 1–2 (49): 234–244. (In Russ.)
2. Tybout James R. (2000) Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries: How Well Do They Do, and Why? // Journal of Economic Literature. 38(1):11–44.
3. Lall S. (2004) Reinventing Industrial Strategy: The Role of Government Policy in Building Industrial Competitiveness // G-24 Discussion Paper. 28.
4. Rodrick D. (2004) Industrial Policy for the Twenty First Century / http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/drodrik/Research%20papers/UNIDOSep.pdf
5. Williams D. (2010) Industrial Policy // Local economy: the journal of the Local Economy Policy. 8: 612–621.
6. Massari S., Sonnemann G., Balkau F. (2016) Life cycle approaches to sustainable regional development / edited by Stefania Massari, Guido Sonnemann and Fritz Balkau. London: Routledge.
7. Fan Yupeng et al. (2017) Emergy analysis on industrial symbiosis of an industrial park – A case study of Hefei economic and technological development area // Journal of cleaner production. 141:791–798.
8. Grankov P.Yu., Burtseva T.A. (2020) Classification of regional clusters and criteria for their effectiveness // Regional Economics and Management: Electronic scientific journal. 3 (63):5. (In Russ.)
9. Klyushnikova E.V., Shitova E.M. (2016) Methodological approaches to the calculation of the integral indicator, ranking methods / Innocenter. 1.: http://innoj.tversu.ru/Vipusk1(10)2016/2%20-%20%D0%9A%D0%BB%D1%8E%D1%88%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0.pdf (Accessed 12.03.2021) (In Russ.)
10. Paruolo P., Saisana M., Saltelli A. (2013) Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science? // Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A – Statistics in Society. 176 (3): 609–634. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–985X.2012.01059.x.
11. Munda G. (2009) Non-compensatory/Non-Linear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting / G. Munda, M. Nardo // Applied Economics. 41: 1513–1523. JRC34883. DOI: 10.1080/00036840601019364.
12. Siburina T.A., Knyazev A.A., Lokhtina L.K., Miroshnikova Yu.V. (2012) Basic methodology and practice of rating assessments in healthcare// Social aspects of public health. 5 (27): URL: http://vestnik.mednet.ru/content/view/427/30/lang,ru.(In Russ.)
13. Rybinets A.G. (2019) World experience in the methodology of building ratings / A.G. Rybinets. M.: Limited Liability Company “Sam Polygraphist”. 224 p– – ISBN978-5-00077-976-7. (In Russ.)
14. Vasilyeva L.V. (2017) Analysis of methodological approaches to the construction of integral economic indicators // Economic research and development. 12: 8–18. (In Russ.)
15. Domnich E.L. (2019) About typical ratings of innovative development of countries and regions // Regionalistics. 3 (6): 42–65. DOI 10.14530/reg. 2019.3.42. (In Russ.)
16. Efimova M.R., Petrova E.V., Rumyantsev V.N. (1999) General theory of statistics: textbook. M.: Infra-M. 416 p. (In Russ.)
17. Gokhberg L.M. (2011) Statistics of science and innovation. Course of socio-economic statistics / Textbook for universities. M.: Omega-L. 586 p. (In Russ.)
18. Hand D.J. (2009) Measurement Theory and Practice: The World Through Quantification. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 332 p.
19. Burtseva T.A., Frenkel A.A., Tikhomirov B.I., Surkov A.A. (2020) Integral index is an effective tool for measuring regional labor productivity // Labor economics. 11:1085–1102. (In Russ.)
20. Stezhkin A.A. (2015) On the methods of validation of rating systems within the framework of the internal ratings approach to assessing the credit risk of banks//Financial analytics: problems and solutions. 32.: 29–41. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Burtseva T.A., Akhmadov A.R. Method for Assessing the Impact of Creating a New Industrial Infrastructure on the Industrial and Socio-Economic Development of Regions. Economics of Science. 2022;8(1):46-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-1-46-57
Views:
378
Email this article 