Theoretical and Methodological Provisions of Quality Management of Professional Activity of The Teaching Staff of Higher Educational Institutions
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-3-4-220-237
Abstract
The article substantiates the relevance of assessing the quality of professional activity of the teaching staff of higher educational institutions in the context of the transformation of the educational process. A study of theoretical and methodological aspects of assessing the quality of work of teaching staff has been conducted. The key components of the category “quality of professional activity of the teaching staff” are identified and a definition based on the essential aspects of the selected components is formulated. The main trends characterizing the modern system of higher education (elements of the transformation of the higher education system) are also highlighted, their impact on the activities of teaching staff of higher educational institutions is analyzed and the emerging demands of the external environment for the qualification of teaching staff are highlighted. As a result of the study, the authors identified inconsistencies in the theoretical and methodological provisions of the assessment of the quality of teaching staff, in particular, inconsistencies between the normative and actual qualification and competence requirements for teaching staff in the conditions of transformation of the educational system.
About the Authors
Y. V. Razumova
Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Razumova – Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Economics and Management
690014, Vladivostok, Gogol Street, 41
E. M. Trapeznikova
Vladivostok State University of Economics and Service
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena M. Trapeznikova – Postgraduate Student, Assistant of the Department of Marketing and Trade
690014, Vladivostok, Gogol Street, 41
References
1. Boyadjieva P., Ilieva-Trichkova P. (2018) Lifelong learning as an emancipation process: A capability approach. In The Palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. P. 267–288.
2. Bagnall R. G., Hodge S. (2018) Contemporary adult and lifelong education and learning: An epistemological analysis. In The Palgrave international handbook on adult and lifelong education and learning. Palgrave Macmillan, London. P. 13–34.
3. Presidential Decree dated 07.05.2018 No 204 (2018) On the national goals and strategic objectives of the development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2024 / Official web-site of the Russian President. http://kremlin.ru/события/президент/новости/57425. (In Russ.)
4. Vasilyeva E. Y. (2006) Approaches to assessing the quality of a university teacher’s activity // University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2:74–78. (In Russ.)
5. Vasilyeva E. Y. (2007) Rating of teachers and departments of the University // University Management: Practice and Analysis. 3:39–48. (In Russ.)
6. Klimuk, V.V., Komarov O. E. (2016) Methodology for assessing the quality of the work of the teaching staff of universities // Bulletin of the South Russian State Technical University (NPI), Series of Socioeconomic Sciences. 5:107–114. (In Russ.)
7. Vasilyeva E. Y., Borichina O. A., Trapitsyn S. Y. (2007) Rating of teachers, faculties and departments of the university. (In Russ.)
8. Trubilin A. I., Grigorash O. V. (2011) A system for assessing the quality of the activities of teachers and departments of the university has been created // Economics of Education. 2:19–23. (In Russ.)
9. Grigorash O. V. (2014) On the indicators of evaluating the effectiveness of universities // Polythematic network electronic Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University. 95:1237–1262. (In Russ.)
10. Popova S. A., Trikhina I. A. (2019) Formation of approaches to assessing the effectiveness of the teaching staff in the personnel policy of a higher educational institution // Bulletin of Eurasian Science. 11(1):35. (In Russ.)
11. Loiko V. I., Romanov D. A., Shaposhnikov V. L., Kushnir N. V., Kushnir A. V. (2016) Modeling and diagnostics of the productivity of the training of scientific and pedagogical personnel // Polythematic Network Electronic Scientific Journal of Kuban State Agrarian University. 120:770–784. (In Russ.)
12. Loiko V. I., Romanov D. A., Shaposhnikov V. L., Kushnir N. V., Kushnir A. V. (2016) Modern models and methods of diagnostics of methodical competence of the teacher // Polythematic online-electronic scientific journal of the Kuban State Agrarian University. 120:785–812. (In Russ.)
13. Prokhorova M. P., Semchenko A. A. (2016) Innovative activity of a university teacher as a factor of the quality of pedagogical education // Bulletin of Mininsky University. 1–1(13):26. (In Russ.)
14. Kuznetsova A. A., Nikishina V. B. (2018) An effective contract as a technology for managing the effectiveness of professional and pedagogical activity of a university teacher // Innovations: Electronic Scientific journal. (4):4–4. (In Russ.)
15. Maslov E. V. (2017) Personnel management of the enterprise: A textbook / Edited by P. V. Shemetov. M.: RSFRA-M; Novosibirsk: NGAIU. 312 p. (In Russ.)
16. Komarova S. V., Savin A. V., Chukhacheva E. V., Charkina N. V. (2022) Models of qualitative assessment of educational process management // Education management: theory and practice. 12(3):161–169. (In Russ.)
17. Federal Law oh the Russian Federation dated 29.12.2012 No 273-FZ (2012) On Education in the Russian Federation / Consultant Plus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_140174. (In Russ.)
18. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 04.10.2000 No 751 (2000) On the National Doctrine of Education in the Russian Federation / Garant. https://base.garant.ru/182563. (In Russ.)
19. Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 08.08.2013 № 678 (2013) On approval of the nomenclature of positions of the teaching staff of organizations engaged in educational activities, positions of heads of educational organizations / Garant. https://base.garant.ru/70429490. (In Russ.)
20. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 30.03.2015 № 293 (2015) About the approval of the Regulations on the procedure for certification of employees holding positions of the teaching staff belonging to the teaching staff / Garant. https://base.garant.ru/70995524. (In Russ.)
21. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 26.06.2010 № 761 (2010) About the approval of the Unified Qualification Directory of positions of managers, specialists and employees, section “Qualification characteristics of positions of education workers” / Consultant Plus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_105703. (In Russ.)
22. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 10.11.2002 № 3906 (2002) On approval of the list of documents and materials submitted for licensing examination during a comprehensive assessment of the activities of a higher educational institution / TechExpert. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901837570. (In Russ.)
23. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 26.12.2017 № 1642 (2014) On the approval of the State Program of the Russian Federation / Garant. https://base.garant.ru/71848426. (In Russ.)
24. Hegel G. V.F. (1974) Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. Мoscow. 452 p. (In Russ.)
25. Basyuk A. S. (2015) The dual nature of the quality category. In Theory and Practice of Economics and Entrepreneurship / Proceedings of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference. P. 45–48. (In Russ.)
26. Welzant, H., Schindler L., Puls-Elvidge S., Crawford L. (2011) Definitions of quality in higher education: A synthesis of the literature // Higher Learning Research Communications. 5(3):2.
27. Pastushenko S. I. (2018) The essence and content of the concepts of “labor potential of the teaching staff” and “competitiveness of the university” // Innovative personnel management. 369–375. (In Russ.)
28. Kosinova E. P., Andreeva L. V. (2017) Motivation of professional activity of university teachers // Tsarskoye Selo Readings. 2:333–335. (In Russ.)
29. Nekhvyadovich E. A., Kosinova E. P., Belov V. G., Parfenov Y. A., Korotenkova R. G. (2015) Motivational characteristics and value orientations of the university teaching staff // Scientific notes of the P. F. Lesgaft University. 5(123):236–241. (In Russ.)
30. Nadreeva L. L., Akhmetova I. A., Afanasyev A. A. (2016) Motivation of labor as a function of education management // Modern problems of Science and Education. 3:358–358. (In Russ.)
31. Pavlova Z. G. (2014) Performance indicators of a university teacher // The world of science, culture, education. 4(47):77–82. (In Russ.)
32. Trapeznikova E. M. (2021) Analysis of requirements for the teaching staff of higher educational institutions // The Economics of Science. 7(3):205–216. (In Russ.)
33. Sharipov F. V. (2010) Professional competence of a university teacher // Higher Education Today. 1:72–77. (In Russ.)
34. Blyagoz N. S. (2014) Professional competence of a university teacher: the main components // Science: Complex Problems. 3:33–38. (In Russ.)
35. Dubrovskaya L. D. (2020) Tutoring in the higher education system: problem statement // Editorial Board. P. 137. (In Russ.)
36. Ilyinykh G. S. (2019) On the issue of digital transformation of higher education (foreign experience) // Actual Problems of Modern Higher Education: from General to Private. P. 26–32. (In Russ.)
37. Elliot T., Kay M., Laplante M. (2016) Digital Transformation in Higher Education. How Content Management Technologies and Practices Are Evolving in the Era of Experience Management. Digital Clarity Group.
38. Bondarenko N. V., Gokhberg L. M., Kovaleva N. V. (2020) Education indicators: 2020: statistical collection. 496 p. (In Russ.)
39. Modernisation of higher education in Europe: academic staff-2017 (2017) / European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/209_academic_staff_2017.pdf.
40. Kazimirova I. S., Panchenko E. Y., Rodnikova O. Y., Ulisko K. A. (2021) On the issue of assessing the quality of work of the teaching staff of a higher educational institution in the conditions of distance learning // Economic Sciences. 196:78–81. (In Russ.)
41. Bedenlier S. (2017) Internationalization within higher education and its influence on faculty: experiences of Turkish academic staff // Journal of Research in International Education. 16(2):185–196.
42. Shchaveleva E. (2019) To accept, or not to accept: prerequisites to ensure quality teacher training // Focus on Language Education and Research. 1(1):28–34.
43. Levchenko V. V., Agrikova E. V., Upirova V. G. (2019) The activity of teachers of higher educational institutions in the context of internationalization of education // Prospects of science and education. 4(40):497–508. (In Russ.)
44. Thomson S., Hillman K. (2019) The Teaching and Learning International Survey 2018. Australian Report Volume 1: Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners.
45. Skills of the future for the 2020s: a new hope (2020) / GEF, WS. 262 p. https://futureskills2020s.com/ru. (In Russ.)
46. Boguslavsky M. V. (2014) Conservative strategy of modernization of Russian education in the XX-early XXI centuries // Problems of Modern Education. 1:5–11. (In Russ.)
47. Boguslavsky M. V., Neborsky E. V. (2016) The concept of development of the higher education system in Russia // The world of science. Pedagogy and psychology. 4(5):7.
48. Boguslavsky M. V., Neborsky E. V. (2017) Strategic trends in the development of the higher education system in the Russian Federation // Humanitarian Studies of Central Russia. 2(3):7–20.
Review
For citations:
Razumova Y.V., Trapeznikova E.M. Theoretical and Methodological Provisions of Quality Management of Professional Activity of The Teaching Staff of Higher Educational Institutions. Economics of Science. 2022;8(3-4):220-237. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-3-4-220-237
Views:
371
Email this article 