Work Incentives for Sectoral Research Institute Researchers
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-3-4-238-254
Abstract
The article considers issues of researchers’ work assessment of sectoral research institutes in the Russian Federation. The authors investigate the advantages and disadvantages of the existing system of scientometric indicators with relation to the researchers’ publication activity increase. Practical solutions are proposed to harmonize the internal and external motivation of the researchers’ work of the sectoral research institute in order to ensure the effectiveness of their scientific activities, the implementation of key indicators of the effectiveness of scientific work and to promote the economic and innovative effect of the institute activities. The authors proposed a conceptual system for stimulating the work of researchers through authorship in scientific publications and evaluated its effectiveness. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a system of incentives for authorship in scientific publications to employees of the Railway Research Institute. The practical significance of the study lies in the possibility of applying the incentive system in many sectors of the modern economy.
Keywords
work stimulation,
work motivation,
researchers,
publication activity,
incentive criteria,
scientific publications,
sectoral research institute
Supporting agencies: The authors express their gratitude to the heads of the Railway Research Institute: Sergey A. Vinogradov, Denis V. Shikunov, Tatyana P. Lomova.
About the Authors
O. N. Rimskaya
Railway Research Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga N. Rimskaya –Associate Professor, Head of the Scientific and Educational Complex
Scopus Author ID: 55811482100
129626, Moscow, 10, 3rd Mytishchinskaya St.
S. N. Naumenko
Railway Research Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Naumenko – Scientific Secretary
Scopus Author ID: 57205073942
129626, Moscow, 10, 3rd Mytishchinskaya St.
References
1. The population of the Russian Federation by gender and age as of January 1, 2021 (2021) / Statistical Bulletin. https://rosstat.gov.ru. (In Russ.)
2. Saltanova S. V. (2021) HSE Science of Russia in 10 figures. https://issek.hse.ru/news/442044357.html. (In Russ.)
3. Bellis De N. (2009) Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis. From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics / The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Lanham, Maryland Toronto Plymouth, UK. P.P.
4. Guide to Scientometry: Indicators of the development of science and technology, second edition (2021) / M. A. Akoev, V. A. Markusova, O. V. Moskaleva, V. V. Pislyakov; edited by M. A. Akoev. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Publishing House. 358 p. (In Russ.)
5. Garfield E. (2011) A Century of Citation Indexing. Keynote address // 12th COLLNET Meeting. September 20–23. Istanbul Bilgi University. Istanbul.
6. Sokolov M. (2020) How will the KBPR metric change the practices of scientists’ publication activity? https://eusp.org/news/mikhail-sokolovkak-metrika-kbpr-izmenit-praktiki-publikacionnoyaktivnosti-uchenykh. (In Russ.)
7. Manylov D. (2021) Why the Ministry of Education and Science is boycotting the reform of the system of evaluation of scientific results. https://forpost-sz.ru/geo/nedra/2021–07–29/pochemu-minobrnauki-bojkotiruet-reformirovanie-sistemy-ocenki-nauchnykh-rezultatov. (In Russ.)
8. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 25.04.2022 No. 231 (2022) On the Declaration of the Decade of Science and Technology in the Russian Federation / Official web-site of the President of Russia. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/47771. (In Russ.)
9. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 19.03.2022 No. 414 (2022) On some issues of the application of requirements and target values of indicators related to publication activity / Consultant Plus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_412174. (In Russ.)
10. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 26.11.2012 No. 2190-r (2012) On approval of the Programme of gradual improvement of the remuneration system in state (municipal) institutions for 2012–2018 / Laws, codes and regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation. https://legalacts.ru/doc/rasporjazheniepravitelstva-rf-ot-26112012-n-2190-r. (In Russ.)
11. Feoktistova O. A. (2014) Development of the system of rationing and stimulation of labor as mechanisms for improving its quality in the field of scientific research. Dissertation. Moscow. 239 p. (In Russ.)
12. Rimskaya O. N. (2007) Improving the work stimulation of university teaching staff in the quality management system. Dissertation. Tomsk. 217 p. (In Russ.)
13. Roe An. (1952) The Making of a Scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co. 235 p.
14. Arefyev P. A. (2013) Publication activity: an introduction to the problem http://www.unkniga.ru/vishee/2142-publikacionnaya-aktivnost-vozmozhnosti-rosta-nauchnogo-produkta.html. (In Russ.)
15. Kasyanov P. (2017) Steady growth of scientometric indicators of the university. What is it and how to achieve it? https://kpfu.ru/portal/docs/F139942026/KFU.conference.2017.RUS_Kasyanov.pdf. (In Russ.)
16. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation dated 05.03.2014 No. 161 (2014) Standard methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific organizations’ performing research, development and technological work for civil purposes / Garant.https://base.garant.ru/70682234. (In Russ.)
17. Russia ranked 10th in the world in terms of the number of indexed scientific publications (2022) / RIA. https://ria.ru/20220208/nauka-1771479284.html?in=t. (In Russ.)
18. Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated 23.08.1996 No. 127-FZ (1996) On Science and State Scientific and Technical Policy / Official web-site of the President of Russia. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/9973. (In Russ.)
19. Model Law “On the Status of a scientist and a researcher” was adopted at the thirty–first plenary session of the Interparliamentary Assembly of the CIS Member States (2008) / Garant. https://base.garant.ru/2571707 (In Russ.)
20. Kalugin A. S., Kalugina O. V., Lebedeva A. A. (2019) Evaluation of publication activity as a way to measure the effectiveness of scientists’ work and its relationship with motivation / HSE. https://vo.hse.ru/data/2019/03/21/1185191859/02%20Kalgin.pdf. (In Russ.)
21. Moskalkova O. V. (2013) Is it possible to evaluate the work of scientists by bibliometric indicators? // Managing large systems. Special Issue 44: “Scientometrics and Expertise in Science Management”. P. 308–331. (In Russ.)
22. National system for evaluating the effectiveness of scientific activity: creation and development (2022) / AviaPort, 11.04.2022. https://www.aviaport.ru/digest/2022/04/11/715429.html. (In Russ.)
23. Lazutkin V. K. (2021) Management of labor motivation of scientific personnel // Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences. 6(2):229–237. DOI: 10.21603/2500-3372-2021-6-2-229-237. (In Russ.)
24. Volodarskaya E. A., Kiseleva V. V. (2012) Remuneration of scientists and motivation of scientific activity / HSE. https://www.hse.ru/data/2012/11/16/1248742134/%D0%9C%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F%20%D0%B8%20%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B0%20%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%-B0.pdf. (In Russ.)
25. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 24.09.2013 No. 842 (2013) On the procedure for awarding academic degrees / Consultant Plus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_152458. (In Russ.)
26. Rimskaya O. N., Kranbikhler V. S. (2020) How to motivate a Russian researcher for high scientific results // Personnel and Intellectual resources management in Russia. 9(6):27–34. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Rimskaya O.N., Naumenko S.N. Work Incentives for Sectoral Research Institute Researchers. Economics of Science. 2022;8(3-4):238-254. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-3-4-238-254
Views:
459
Email this article 