Possibilities of Science in Innovative Development: “Measuring Technologies”
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-1-36-44
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to identify the main conditions that ensure the influence of science on innovation, especially in terms of technological innovation. Comparative and structural analysis, application of measurement procedures, and evaluation of empirical data constitute the methodology of the study. The results of the study can be reduced to a number of provisions confirmed by analysis. Firstly, in Russia, in the course of permanent reorganizations, the institutional, informational, funding, and even personnel potential (due to a reduction in the number of researchers) was greatly weakened. Thus, the impact of scientific knowledge on the innovation process was clearly reduced, although the thesis that innovations are always results of scientific activities is difficult to dispute. Secondly, we should not talk about it as a direct relationship, but through the time lags. It is they who become a stumbling block in the conducting and planning current scientific and technological policy. Thirdly, the author has showed the main problems of technological innovation in Russia, identified in the course of many years of author’s research, supporting the important conclusion about the lack of an accurate representation and measurement of the level of technological effectiveness of the economy. The author has also proposed to solve this problem by detailing and improving accounting and statistical procedures in the field of technology, e. g., by means of technological maps, as well as by introducing an indicator as technology coverage of relevant objects (enterprises, regions, etc.). The current piece measurement of technologies does not consider coverage. Such an omission causes a significant distortion in the assessment of the technological level, as well as in further studies of the relationship between basic science, R&D, and technological development.
About the Authors
V. P. ChichkanovRussian Federation
Valery P. Chichkanov – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Former Vice Prime Minister of the Government of the Russian Federation, Advisor to the President of the Russian Academy of Sciences
RISC AuthorID: 547330, Scopus Author ID: 57190411321
119334, Moscow, Leninsky prospect, 32 A
O. S. Sukharev
Institute of Economics RAS
Russian Federation
Oleg S. Sukharev – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Chief Researcher of the Center for Socio-Economic Development Institutes of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of State and Municipal Administration, Faculty of Public Administration, Moscow State University
Scopus Author ID: 56736819100
217418, Moscow, Nakhimovsky prospect 32
References
1. Chichkanov, V.P., & Sukharev O. S. (2021). Rankings in economic governance: information content and expediency. Scientific Bulletin of the Russian Defense Industry, 3, 72–82. doi: 10.52135/2410–4124_2021_3_72 (In Russ)
2. Chichkanov, V.P., Sukharev O. S., & Vorobieva M. V. (2022) Scientific and technological development of Russia: measurement problems in the regional context. Scientific Bulletin of the Russian Defense Industry, 3, 74–79. (In Russ)
3. Glazyev, S.Yu. (2018). Leap into the future. Russia in the new technological and world economic structures. Moscow: Knizhny Mir., 768 p. (In Russ)
4. Ivanov, V.V. (2021) Reforms of Russian science: origins, results, prospects. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 6(232), 82–96. doi:10.38197/2072-2060-2021-232-6-82-96 (In Russ)
5. Ivanov, V.V. (2022). New science and technology policy. Economic revival of Russia, 3 (73), 24–28. doi: 10.37930/1990-9780-2022-3-73-24-28 (In Russ)
6. Lu, Ya. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005
7. Malinetsky, G.G. (2022). Do not go back to the 16th century. Designing the future. Problems of digital reality, 1 (5), 43–64. doi: 10.20948/future-2022–4 (In Russ)
8. Nazarko, J., & Ejdys, J. (2017). Structural Analysis as an Instrument instrument for Identification identification of Critical critical Drivers drivers of Technology technology Developmentdevelopment. Procedia Engineering, 182, 474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.137
9. Su, H.-N., & Moaniba, I.M. (2017). Investigating the dynamics of interdisciplinary evolution in technology developments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.024
10. Sukharev, O.S. (2019) Innovative development strategy: agents and national projects in Russia. Investments in Russia, 5, 3–14. (In Russ)
11. Sukharev, O.S. (2021). Scientific product: solving the problem of assessing the effectiveness of science. Ergodesign, 2, 110–117 doi: 10.30987/2658-4026-2021-2-110-117 (In Russ)
12. Weber, A. (2011). The role of education in knowledge economies in developing countries. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2589–2594. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.151
Review
For citations:
Chichkanov V.P., Sukharev O.S. Possibilities of Science in Innovative Development: “Measuring Technologies”. Economics of Science. 2023;9(1):36-44. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-1-36-44