Measuring the level of technological sovereignty in foreign countries: the experience of the European Union
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-3-47-60
Abstract
The article examines the European experience in determining and measuring the achieved level of technological sovereignty in relation to individual countries, industries and technologies. The prerequisites for the actualization of the topic of technological independence in the EU countries, the key elements of the European concept of technological independence, the stages of evolution of approaches to the calculation of technological sovereignty indices are highlighted. It is shown that when developing an algorithm for calculating this index, it is necessary to ensure the reliability of sources, the availability of data, and the possibility of updating the results over time. As barriers to the application of algorithms for calculating the level of technological sovereignty of specific industries, the absence of a strict binding of companies to individual industries and technologies in reporting documents and statistical collections, as well as the impossibility of obtaining reliable estimates of the number of specialists involved in the production and research process, are indicated. The results of the analysis of approaches and a set of indicators of technological sovereignty used in the EU countries can be considered when developing algorithms for calculating the level of technological independence of domestic industries and technologies.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. A. YeremchenkoRussian Federation
Olga A. Yeremchenko – Leading Analyst of the Department of Analytics and Monitoring
Scopus Author ID: 55811482100
127254, Moscow, Dobrolubova Str., 11
N. G. Kurakova
Russian Federation
Natalia G. Kurakova – Doctor of Biology, Head of the Department of Analytics and Monitoring
Scopus Author ID: 55441402000
127254, Moscow, Dobrolubova Str., 11
References
1. Batura, O., Flickenschild, M., Ramahandry, T., Bonneau, V. (2021) Key enabling technologies for Europe’s technological sovereignty. Technical Report / European Parliamentary Research Service. DOI: 10.2861/24482.
2. Chen, W. (2020) How Zhongguancun became the innovation hub powering China’s tech aspirations. https://kr-asia.com/how-zhongguancun-became-the-innovation-hub-powering-chinas-tech-aspirations.
3. Crespi, F., Caravella, S., Menghini, M., Salvatori, C. (2021) European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy, Intereconomics, 56, 348–354.
4. Daneikin, Yu.V. (2022) Achieving technological sovereignty of high-tech economies of the Russian Federation: state and prospects. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Economics. Management. Law”, 4, 74–92. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2022-4-74-92 (In Russ)
5. Decree of the Government of Russia dated April 15, 2023 N603 (2023) On Approval of Priority Directions for Technological Sovereignty Projects and Structural Adaptation Projects of the Economy of the Russian Federation and the Regulations on the Conditions for Classifying Projects as Technological Sovereignty Projects and Structural Adaptation Projects for the Economy of the Russian Federation, on Submission of Information on projects of technological sovereignty and projects of structural adaptation of the economy of the Russian Federation and maintaining a register of these projects, as well as on the requirements for organizations authorized to submit opinions on the compliance of projects with the requirements for projects of technological sovereignty and projects of structural adaptation of the economy of the Russian Federation. Electronic Fund of Legal and Regulatory and Technical documents. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1301344071 (In Russ)
6. Decree of the Government of Russia dated May 20, 2023 No. 1315-r (2023) On approval of the Concept of technological development for the period up to 2030 / ConsultantPlus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_447895 (In Russ)
7. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of January 26, 2023 N Pr-144 (2023) List of instructions following the meeting of the Council for Strategic Development and National Projects / Electronic Fund of Legal and Regulatory and Technical Documents. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1300789591#64U0IK (In Russ)
8. EC European Commission (2021) Strategic dependencies and capacities. Brussels.
9. Edler, Ja., Blind, K. et al. Technology sovereignty. From demand to concept / Fraunhofer ISI. 2020. https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isi/dokumente/publikationen/technology_sovereignty.pdf.
10. European Commission, Re-finding Industry: Defining innovation, Report of the independent High-Level Group on industrial technologies (2018) European Commission. Directorate General for Research and Innovation. 56 p.
11. Grassano, N., Hernández Guevara, H., Fako, P. et al. (2022) The 2022 EU industrial R&D investment scoreboard: extended summary of key findings and policy implications. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI:10.2760/08410.
12. Kamchatova, E.Y., Muratova, M.N. (2023) The possibilities of using the resource approach in ensuring the technological sovereignty of the industry of the Russian Federation. Innovations and Investments, 2, 196–201 (In Russ)
13. Konstantinov, I.B., Konstantinova, E.P. (2022) Technological sovereignty as a strategy for the future development of the Russian economy. Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration, 22, 5, 12–22 (In Russ)
14. Kvint, V.L., Novikova, I.V., Alimuradov, M.K., Sasaev, N.I. (2022) Strategizing the National Economy during a Period of Burgeoning Technological Sovereignty, Administrative consulting, 9, 57–67 (In Russ)
15. Oruch T. A. (2023) Study of indicators and results of import substitution in Russian industry. Innovation and Investments, 1, 289–293 (In Russ)
16. Ponte, A., Leon, G., Alvarez, I. (2022) Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: An empirical approach, Telecommunications Policy. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102459.
17. Prikhodko, I.I. (2022) Theoretical aspects of the concept of technological sovereignty. Uchenye zapiski V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Economics and Management, 8 (74), 4, 88–96 (In Russ)
18. Puglierin, Ja., Zerka, P. et al. (2022) European Sovereignty Index / ECFR. June 2022. https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/European-Sovereignty-Index.pdf.
19. Sudorgin, O.A., Makarenko, E.I. (2022) Technological sovereignty and training of the future technical intelligentsia. Power, 5, 145–150 (In Russ)
20. Sukharev О. S. (2023) Technological sovereignty: decisions at the macroeconomic and industry level // Microeconomics, 2, 19–33 (In Russ)
21. Zhdaneev, O.V. (2022) Ensuring the technological sovereignty of the branches of the fuel and energy complex of the Russian Federation. Zapiski Gornogo instituta, 258, 1061–1078. DOI: 10.31897/PMI.2022.107 (In Russ)
Review
For citations:
Yeremchenko O.A., Kurakova N.G. Measuring the level of technological sovereignty in foreign countries: the experience of the European Union. Economics of Science. 2023;9(3):47-60. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-3-47-60