The Main Directions of State Policy in Ensuring Technological Sovereignty
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-1-10-20
Abstract
An analysis of the reforms in the scientific and technological complex and higher education system in Russia shows that the tasks assigned have been successfully achieved. However, in current conditions, the need for a new state-led scientific and technical strategy is evident. The main goals are to achieve technological sovereignty and transition the economy into a full cycle of innovation. The goal of this article is to identify new objectives and priorities for scientific and technological advancement to ensure technological sovereignty. Descriptive, comparative, and taxonomical methods are employed in the analysis. The paper identifies the main areas of government policy aimed at achieving technological sovereignty in Russia, and this constitutes the main finding. Additionally, it is essential to develop new objectives and strategies for scientific and technological growth. In fact, the new scientific and technological policy should include the following issues: organizing scientific research, developing innovative territories, integrating science and education, conducting scientific diplomacy, providing resource and legislative support, and measuring the effectiveness of the scientific-technological complex.
About the Author
V. V. Ivanov
Information and Analytical Center «Nauka», Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Ivanov – Doctor of Economics, Candidate of Sciences in Engineering, Corresponding Member of RAS, Deputy President of the Russian Academy of Sciences
1119991, Moscow, Leninsky Pr., 14
References
1. Alborova, M.B., Biryukov, A.V., Bulva, V.I. et al. (2023). Scientific and technological progress and modern international relations; In 2 volumes. Textbook for universities/ Edited by A. V. Biryukova; responsible editor M. B. Alborova, A. V. Krutskikh. Moscow: Aspect-press Publishing House (in Russ)
2. Bell, D. (1999). The coming post-industrial society: A Venture of social forecasting. Moscow: Academia (in Russ)
3. Dergacheva, E.A. (2016). Socio-techno-natural globalization concept: Interdisciplinary analysis. Moscow: Lenand (in Russ)
4. Glazyev, S.Yu. (2009). The battle for leadership in the 21st century. Russia, USA, China. Seven options for the near future. Moscow: Europe (in Russ)
5. Glazyev, S.Yu., Kara-Murza, S.G., Batchikov, S.A. (2002). White Book. Economic reforms in Russia 1991–2001. Moscow: Algorithm (in Russ)
6. Huang, S., Wang, B., Li, X., Zheng, P., Mourtzis, D., & Wang, L. (2022). Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0— Comparison, complementation and co-evolution. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 424–428. doi: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.07.010
7. Ivanov, V.V. (2022). Globalization 4.0: Background and Outcomes. Voprosy Filosofii, 8, 195–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-8-195-200 (in Russ)
8. Ivanov, V.V. (2015). Innovation Paradigm XXI (2nd ed.). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ)
9. Ivanov, V.V. (2017). Global Humanitarian and Technological Revolution: Background and Prospects. Innovations, 6, 3–8. (in Russ)
10. Ivanov, V.V. (2020). Development of fundamental institutions of globalization. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, 223(3), 123–134. (in Russ) doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-223-3-123-134
11. Ivanov, V.V. (2020). Outlines of a New World Order. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 63(5), 7–27. doi: 10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-5-28-52 (in Russ)
12. Ivanov, V.V. (2023). Reforms of Science: A New Vector. Economics of Science, 9(1), 8–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2023-9-1-8-20 (In Russ)
13. Ivanov, V.V., Malinetsky, G.G., Sirenko, S.N. et al. (2018). Contours of digital reality. Humanitarian and technological revolution and the choice of the future. Ed. Ivanov, V. V., Malinetsky, G.G., Sirenko, S. N. Moscow: Lenand (in Russ)
14. Ivanov, V.V., Malinetsky, G.G. (2019). Philosophical Foundations of the Humanitarian and Technological Revolution. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences, 62(4), 76–95. doi: 10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-4-76-95 (in Russ)
15. Reports of the Russian Academy of Sciences to the President of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Russian Federation «On the Implementation of State Scientific and Technical Policy and the Main Scientific Achievements of Russian Scientists» for 2017–2022. (2023). Moscow: RAS (in Russ)
16. Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: «E» Publishing House. (in Russ)
17. Schwab, K. (2018). Technologies of the fourth industrial revolution. Moscow: EKSMO. (in Russ)
18. Zhores Alferov: Peter the Great’s triad is worthy of the Nobel Prize. Interview. (2001). Novaya gazeta. https://www.peoples.ru/science/physics/alferov/interview.html (in Russ)
Review
For citations:
Ivanov V.V. The Main Directions of State Policy in Ensuring Technological Sovereignty. Economics of Science. 2024;10(1):10-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-1-10-20
Views:
719
Email this article 