Preview

Economics of Science

Advanced search

Economics of technology as a scientific field: Retrospective and prospective aspects

https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-1-41-53

Abstract

This article examines a number of aspects in the development of the economics of technology as an independent research direction. This field falls under the umbrella of a broader discipline of the ‘economics of scientific and technological progress’, which was founded by a group of outstanding Soviet economists. The article analyses the methodological principles behind the economics of technology as a modern field of science. Additionally, the contribution made by the Soviet and Russian economic schools, as well as the continuity of their studies, are discussed. The research methodology is based on theories of technological change and development factors. Comparative analysis is used to explore the chronology of including technology in the realm of economic analysis. The results obtained indicate that modern works by the Russian economic school, including those on the ‘combinatorial growth’ of technologies, significantly alter the widely-held concept of technological evolution and most well-known models of technological dynamics, which rely on J. Schumpeter’s principle of creative destruction. In this respect, the emerging research direction –  economics of technology –  continues the traditions of the Soviet economic school of Heynman–L’vov–Anchishkin. While considering the economic impact, renewal, or forecasting of technological development, this direction also focuses on interactions between technologies and their dynamics. Technologies advance at various rates along various areas of production activities, both within their core and periphery. Consequently, the structure of technologies within each type of activity, as well as the structural design of each technology within the ‘core–periphery’ framework, is of fundamental importance. The conclusion is made that the research direction of the economics of technology consists in studying the effects of combinatorial growth in technological fields, technological duality, and the sensitivity of technological development goals to different industrial policy instruments. This direction also includes modes and models of substituting and adding technologies, as well as technological neutrality and its impact on economic growth.

About the Author

O. S. Sukharev
RAS Institute of Economics; Institute for the Study of Science, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Oleg S. Sukharev – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Chief Researcher of the Center for Socio-Economic Development Institutes at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Chief Researcher of the Sector for Forecasting and Priorities in Science and Innovation at the Institute for the Study of Science of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of State and Municipal Administration, Faculty of Public Administration, Moscow State University

Scopus Author ID: 56736819100

217418, Moscow, Nakhimovsky prospect 32



References

1. Anchishkin, A.I. (1986). Science, technology, economics. Moscow: Economics. (In Russ)

2. Breschi, S., Malerba, F., Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation. The Economic Journal, 110 (463), 388–410.

3. Chichkanov, V.P., Sukharev, O.S. (2023). Possibilities of Science in Innovative Development: “measuring technologies.” Economics of Science, 9(1), 36–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2023-9-1-36-44 (In Russ)

4. Davis, L.E., North, D.S. (2008). Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge University Press; Reissue edition.

5. Futia, C.A. (1980). Schumpeterian Competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), 675–695. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885663

6. Glazyev, S.Yu. (1993). Theory of long-term technical and economic development. Moscow: Vladar. (In Russ)

7. Glazyev, S.Yu. (2018). Leap into the future. Russia in new technological and world economic structures. Moscow: Knizhnyi mir. (In Russ)

8. Hanusch, H., Pyka, А. (2007). “Manifesto” for Comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian Economics. History of Economic Ideas, 15 (1), 23–41.

9. Hartmann, D., Pyka, A., Hanusch N. (2010). Applying Comprehensive Neo-Schumpeterian Economics to Latin American Economies. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 21(1), 70–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2009.11.003

10. Heynman, S.A. (1972). Some issues of forecasting scientific and technological progress. Bulletin of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 6, 57–63

11. Heynman, S.A. (1973). Scientific and technological progress and the structure of social production. Economic Issues, 1, 15–26 (In Russ)

12. Heynman, S.A. (1977). Scientific and technological revolution today and tomorrow. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ)

13. Heynman, S.A. (2008). Efficiency of the national economy: sources of growth, losses and reserves. Collection of scientific works in 2 volumes: Institute of Economics RAS. (In Russ)

14. Hodgson, G. (2004). The Evolution of Institutional Economics: Agency, Structure and Darwinism in American Institutionalism. London: Routledge.

15. Ivanov, V.V. (2022). New science and technology policy. Economic revival of Russia, 3(73), 24–28. doi: 10.37930/1990-9780-2022-3-73-24-28 (In Russ)

16. Lvov, D.S. (1966). Fundamentals of economic design of machines. Moscow: Economics. (In Russ)

17. Lvov, D.S. (1990). Effective management of technological development. Moscow: Economics (In Russ)

18. Lvov, D.S. (1999). Development of the Russian economy and tasks of economic science. Moscow: Economics, 79 p. (In Russ)

19. Lvov, D.S., Glazyev, S.Yu. (1986). Theoretical and applied aspects of scientific and technological progress management. Economics and mathematical methods, 5, 793–804 (In Russ)

20. Menshikov, S. M., Klimenko, L.A. (1989). Long waves in economics. When society changes its skin. Moscow: International. relationships. (In Russ)

21. Perez, C. (1983). Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. Futures, 4 (15), 357–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016–3287(83)90050-2

22. Perez, C. (2011). Technological revolutions and financial capital. Dynamics of bubbles and periods of prosperity. Moscow: Publishing house «Delo». (In Russ)

23. Schumpeter, J.A. (2007). Theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russ)

24. Sengupta, Jati K. (2001). A model of Schumpeterian dynamics. Applied Economics Letters, 8(2), 81–84. doi: https://doi-org./10.1080/13504850150204101

25. Skobelev, D.O. (2020). Best available technologies: experience in improving resource and environmental efficiency of production. Moscow: AST. (In Russ)

26. Sukharev, O.S. (2014). Economic growth, institutions and technologies. Moscow: Finance and Statistics, 464 p. (In Russ)

27. Sukharev, O.S. (2017). An evolutionary economic theory of institutions and technology. Modeling problems. Moscow: Lenand. (In Russ)


Review

For citations:


Sukharev O.S. Economics of technology as a scientific field: Retrospective and prospective aspects. Economics of Science. 2024;10(1):41-53. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-1-41-53

Views: 630


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-132X (Print)
ISSN 2949-4680 (Online)