Preview

Economics of Science

Advanced search

Science, Innovation аnd Investment: Prospective Aspects of Russian Industrialisation

Abstract

This paper explores the systemic relationship between the development of science, innovation, technological efficiency in the economy, and investment. The study aims to structurally analyse the impact of innovator and conservative models on industrial development and the formulation of economic policy strategies. The methodology adopts a neo-Schumpeterian approach to economic development, structural analysis, theories of industrial development, and empirical estimations. The research utilises data from the Russian statistical agency Rosstat, the World Bank, and the author’s prior scientific findings. The study demonstrates that innovators and conservatives, as two types of agents driving scientific and technological progress, exhibit distinct behavioural models. These models depend on the nature of the innovation and the mode of technological development, which are characterised by the principles of ‘creative destruction’ and ‘combinatorial growth.’ Similarly, the types of industrialisation policies are shaped by the dominance of one principle over the other. Furthermore, investment strategies for stimulating new technologies vary significantly across these modes. The results reveal that overall technological capability shows low sensitivity to investments in new technologies. This finding underscores the need for increased resources –  not only financial but also labour and capital. Additionally, reducing development risks through state-led investments and potential insurance schemes is crucial for addressing the challenges of new industrialisation. This approach provides valuable insights for promoting R&D and integrating domestic patents into production processes.

About the Author

O. S. Sukharev
Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Oleg S. Sukharev –  Doctor of Economics, Professor, Chief Researcher of the Center for Socio-Economic Development Institutes; Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of State and Municipal Administration, Faculty of Public Administration, Moscow State University,

32, Nakhimovsky pr., Moscow, 217418.

Scopus Author ID: 56736819100.



References

1. Anchishkin, A.I. (1986). Science, technology, economics. Moscow: Economica. (in Russian)

2. Glazunova, V.V. (2024). Measuring technological development and sovereignty. Economics of Science, 3(10), 22–33. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2024-10-3-22-33 (in Russian)

3. Glazyev, S.Yu. (2018). A leap into the future: Russia in the new technological and world economic orders. Moscow: Knizhny Mir. (in Russian)

4. Glazyev, S.Yu. (1993). Theory of long-term techno-economic development. Moscow: Vladar. (in Russian)

5. Perez, C. (2011). Technological revolutions and financial capital: Dynamics of bubbles and periods of prosperity. Moscow: Publishing House “DELO”. (in Russian)

6. Prebisch, R. (1992). Peripheral capitalism: Is there an alternative? Moscow: ILA RAS. (in Russian)

7. Skobelev, D.O. (2020). Best available technologies: Experience in improving the efficiency of resource and environmental efficiency of production. Moscow: AST. (in Russian)

8. Spasennikov, V.V. (2024). Improving the system of creating intellectual property objects. Economics of Science, 10(3), 66–81. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2024-10-3-66-81

9. Sukharev, O.S. (2016). Evolutionary economics of innovators and conservatives: The way agents make decisions. PNRPU Bulletin. Social and Economic Sciences, 4, 253–287. (in Russian)

10. Sukharev, O.S. (2020). Schumpeter’s innovative dynamics in Russia. PNRPU Bulletin. Social and Economic Sciences, 3, 221–234. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.15593/2224–9354/2020.3.16 (in Russian)

11. Heineman, S.A. (2008). Efficiency of the national economy: Sources of growth, losses and reserves (Vols. 1–2). Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS. (in Russian)

12. Chichkanov, V.P., & Sukharev, O.S. (2023). Possibilities of science in innovative development: “measuring technologies”. Economics of Science, 9(1), 36–44. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2023-9-1-36-44

13. Schumpeter, J.A. (2007). Theory of economic development: Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow: Eksmo. (in Russian)

14. Futia, C.A. (1980). Schumpeterian competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94(4), 675–695. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885663

15. Jacob, E., Blind, K., Kroll, H., & Schubert, T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy: Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, 52(6), 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765, EDN: JFINLC

16. Sengupta, J. K. (2001). A model of Schumpeterian dynamics. Applied Economics Letters, 8(2), 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850150204101

17. Hanusch, H., & Pyka, A. (2007). Manifesto for comprehensive neo-Schumpeterian economics. History of Economic Ideas, 15(1), 23–41.

18. North, D.S. (2008). Institutional change and American economic growth. Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1971)

19. Perez, C. (1983). Structural change and assimilation of new technologies in economic and social systems. Futures, 15(5), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016–3287(83)90050-2


Review

For citations:


Sukharev O.S. Science, Innovation аnd Investment: Prospective Aspects of Russian Industrialisation. Economics of Science. 2025;11(1):23-38. (In Russ.)

Views: 144


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-132X (Print)
ISSN 2949-4680 (Online)