On Russia’s technological sovereignty in the context of research and technological development performance
EDN: DAVEHW
Abstract
At the beginning of the 21st century, the world scientific practice has significantly increased interest to the role of high technology in socio-economic development. At the same time, the debate has intensified about the extent to which a country can consider itself technologically independent, even if it possesses technologies that ensure food, industrial and environmental independence. The article considers the concept of technological sovereignty, its peculiarities in the context of modern digital technologies. It also considers approaches to elaboration of priorities in science and technology in leading foreign countries and in the Russian Federation, that provide the basis for ensuring technological sovereignty at the national level. It’s pointed out that actually in Russia there is no national center for monitoring, management and evaluation of the results of the implementation of programs and projects within the framework of the state S&T policy, especially of the results of the implementing S&T priorities. Such a situation poses significant risks in the light of ensuring the technological sovereignty of the country. The article substantiates the necessity of implementing a centralized approach to establishing the science and technology management system.
About the Authors
V. P. ZavarukhinRussian Federation
Vladimir P. Zavarukhin – Cand.Sci. in Economics, Director
32, Nakhimovsky Pr., Moscow, 117218
V. N. Kiselev
Russian Federation
Vladimir N. Kiselev – Cand.Sci. in Economics, Senior Researcher
32, Nakhimovsky Pr., Moscow, 117218
References
1. RAS: Russia has lost 50,000 scientists in the past five years. Retrieved September 27, 2024 from https://news.rambler.ru/community/50758686-ran-rossiya-poteryala-50-tys-nauchnyh-sotrudnikovv-techenie-poslednih-pyati-let/ (in Russian)
2. Zavarukhin, V.P., & Kleeva, L.P. (2023). R&D performance evaluation system as the basis for monitoring the research and technological sphere. Economics of Science, 9(1), 56–66. (in Russian) EDN: EAYYKY, https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-1-56-66
3. Kravtsov, A.А. (2018). The national research system and scientific policy of France in XXI century: key areas and development trends. MIR (Modernization, Innovation, Development), 9(4), 643–656. (in Russian) EDN: POTYKA, https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2018.9.4.643-656
4. Losev, A. (2018, February 20). Nuclear power and technological sovereignty. Retrieved August 8, 2024 from https://archive.atomicexpert.com/page2213466.html (in Russian)
5. Priority areas for the development of civil science and technology. (1996). Retrieved September 19, 2023 from http://www.chem.msu.su/rus/journals/xr/press.html (in Russian)
6. Transcript of the plenary session. (2022). St. Petersburg International Economic Forum. Retrieved October 22, 2024 from https://rg.ru/2022/06/17/stenogramma-o-chem-rasskazal-vladimir-putin-na-plenarnom-zasedaniipmef-2022 (in Russian)
7. Sukharev, O.S. (2023). Technological sovereignty: solutions on the macroeconomic and industry level. Microeconomics, 2, 19–33. EDN: XHQEVM, https://doi.org/10.33917/mic-2.109.2023.19–33 (in Russian)
8. Сухарев, О.С. (2024). Технологический суверенитет России: Измерение и политика. ЛЕНАНД. Sukharev, O.S. (2024). Technological sovereignty of Russia: Measurement and policy. LENAND. (in Russian)
9. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 01.12.2016 № 642 “On the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation”. (2016). Retrieved September 22, 2024 from http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449/ (in Russian)
10. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 28 February 2024. № 145 “On the Strategy for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation”. (2024a) Retrieved August 8, 2024 https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/408518353/ (in Russian)
11. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 18.06.2024 г. № 529 « On approval of priority areas of scientific and technological development and the list of the most important science-intensive technologies». (2024b). Retrieved October 9, 2024 from http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50755 (in Russian)
12. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 07.05.2024 № 309 “On the Development Goals of the Russian Federation through 2030 and for the Future Until 2036”. (2024c). Retrieved August 8, 2024 from http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/50542 (in Russian)
13. Shitov, A. (2018, November 29). Two doctrines: How Russia’s and the United States’ approaches to information security differ. TASS. Retrieved June 14, 2024 from https://tass.ru/opinions/5844455 (in Russian)
14. Edler, J., Blind, K., Kroll, H., & Schubert, T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy (Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Paper No. 70). Retrieved June 8, 2024 from https://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/content/dam/isi/dokumente/cci/innovation-systems-policy-analysis/2021/discussionpaper_70_2021.pdf
15. Fiscal year 2023 administration research and development budget priorities. (2021). Retrieved July 19, 2024 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/M-21–32-Multi-Agency-Research-andDevelopment-Prioirties-for-FY-2023-Budget-.pdf
16. Ilves, L., & Osula, A.-M. (2020). The technological sovereignty dilemma – and how new technology can offer a way out. European Cybersecurity Journal, 6(1), 24–35. Retrieved June 10, 2023 from https://m.guardtime.com/files/Ilves_Osula.pdf
17. Letter to the Chairman of the European Commission. (2024). Retrieved June 9, 2024 from https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/01/DE-DK-FI-EE-Letter-to-COM-President-on-Digital-Sovereignty_final.pdf
18. LOI № 2020–1674 du 24 décembre 2020 de programmation de la recherche pour les années 2021 à 2030. (2020). Retrieved July 14, 2023 from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000042738027
19. March, C., & Schieferdecker, I. (2021). Technology sovereignty as ability, not autarky (CESifo Working Paper No. 9139). CESifo. Retrieved July 8, 2024 from https://www.ifo.de/en/cesifo/publications/2021/workingpaper/technological-sovereignty-ability-not-autarky
20. National cybersecurity strategy. (2023). Retrieved June 14, 2024 from https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/National-Cybersecurity-Strategy-2023.pdf
21. OECD reviews of innovation policy: Russian Federation 2011. (2011). OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264113138-en. Retrieved October 8, 2024 from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-reviews-of-innovation-policy-russian-federation-2011_9789264113138-en.html
22. The Federal Government of Germany. The High-Tech Strategy 2025. (2024). Retrieved August 16, 2024 from https://www.bmbf.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/DE/FS/657232_Bericht_zur_Hightech-Strategie_2025_en.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
Review
For citations:
Zavarukhin V.P., Kiselev V.N. On Russia’s technological sovereignty in the context of research and technological development performance. Economics of Science. 2025;11(2):18–28. (In Russ.) EDN: DAVEHW