Monitoring regional technological development and sovereignty: an organizational mechanism
EDN: OJWIDC
Abstract
The article reveals the specifics of organizing technological development monitoring at the regional level, considering the goals and objectives of national development in the technological sphere, as well as the need to create clarifying indicative parameters for conducting an economic analysis of the level of technological independence. The objective of the study is to develop groups of indicators that are integrated into a unified system for monitoring regional technological development and allow for the assessment of interregional inequality to develop a set of preventive, operational, and strategic measures for achieving technological sovereignty in the modern world. The research objective is to examine the current legislative framework, which sets the direction of technological development in the Russian Federation; to consider approaches to organizing technological development monitoring and analysis of the level of interregional technological development; and to develop indicators for monitoring regions by the level of technological development. The research methodology is based on the theory of technological and regional development, dialectical and system-complex approaches, methods of generalization, systematization, critical analysis, induction and deduction, expert and point assessment. The study states that the regulations for monitoring technological development at the national level lack consistency and there is a lack of a unified methodology for interregional analysis. Authors developed the goals and objectives of a regional system for monitoring the level of technological development, proposed a definition of the concept of «regional technological sovereignty», and identified the structural components of the regional technological development ecosystem, their qualitative characteristics, and a mechanism for their assessment. The study’s findings can provide insight into the issue of interregional disparities.
About the Authors
N. A. Kulagina
MIREA – Russian Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Natalia A. Kulagina – Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Financial Accounting and Control
78, Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119454
V. V. Garipova
Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Venera V. Garipova – Candidate of Economics, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Financial Management
42, Moskovskaya str., Kazan, 420111, Republic of Tatarstan
References
1. Abashkin, V.L., Abdrakhmanova, G.I., Artemov, S.V., et al. (2025). Russian Regional Innovation Scoreboard. Issue 10 [Electronic resource]. Ed. by L. Gokhberg, E. Kutsenko. HSE ISSEK (in Russian)
2. Afanasev, A.A. (2022). Technological sovereignty as a scientific category in the contemporary knowledge. Journal of economics, entrepreneurship and law, 12(9), 2377–2394. EDN: KEKJUR, https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.12.9.116243 (in Russian)
3. Gareev, T.R. (2023). Technological sovereignty: from conceptual contradiction to practical implementation. Terra Economicus, 21(4), 38–54. EDN: RAJNXU, https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-38-54 (in Russian)
4. Goryacheva, T.V., & Myzrova, O.A. (2023). The role and place of technological sovereignty in ensuring the Russian economy sustainability. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Economics. Management. Law, 23(2), 134–145. EDN: GHNDZK, https://doi.org/10.18500/1994-2540-2023-23-2-134-145 (in Russian)
5. Dankov, S.O., & Stryabkova, E.A. (2024). Assessment of the innovative potential of the region. Research Result. Economic Research, 10(3), 33–45. EDN: AZBFQC, https://doi.org/10.18413/2409-1634-2024-10-3-0-4 (in Russian)
6. Zavarukhin, V.P., & Kiselev, V.N. (2025). On Russia’s technological sovereignty in the context of research and technological development performance. Economics of Science, 11(2), 18–28. EDN: DAVEHW (in Russian)
7. Ivanov, V.V. (2024). The main directions of state policy in ensuring technological sovereignty. Economics of Science, 10(1), 10–20. EDN: FTMHIH, https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2024-10-1-10-20 (in Russian)
8. Kopteva, L.A., Igishev, A.V., & Sbitnev, N.A. (2024). Ensuring the technological sovereignty of the Russian Federation: realities and new opportunities. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis and Practice, (5), 26–46. EDN: UURPLE, https://doi.org/10.24412/2071-6435-2024-5-26-46 (in Russian)
9. Mandych I.A., Bykova A.V., & Geiman, O.B. Features of assessing the investment attractiveness of hightech projects. Russian Technological Journal, 10(2), 75–86. EDN: EUUJMW, https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2022-10-2-75-86 (in Russian)
10. Nikonova, A.A. (2023). Russia’s technological sovereignty: research and modeling from the standpoint of system transformation of the economy. π-Economy, 16(5), 22–37. EDN: ESEDCV, https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.16502 (in Russian)
11. Petrov, M.N., & Filippov, Ya.S. (2023). Technological sovereignty: Evolution of Russian and foreign economic models. Economy: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow, 13 (5А), 305–314. EDN: KPLJZF, https://doi.org/10.34670/AR.2023.38.40.116 (in Russian)
12. Potaptseva, E.V., & Akberdina, V.V. (2023). Technological sovereignty: concept, content and forms of implementation. Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics, 25(3), 5–16. EDN: VDGLXR, https://doi.org/10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2023.3.1 (in Russian)
13. Sukharev, O.S. (2023). Technological independence of Russia: methods of provision. Russia: Society, Politics, History, 1(6), 24–39. EDN: YJTNXJ, https://doi.org/10.56654/ROPI-2023–1(6)-24–39 (in Russian)
14. Sukharev, O.S. (2024). Technological sovereignty of Russia: formation on the basis of the development of the “knowledge economy” sector. Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, (1), 47–64. EDN: GBHZQW, https://doi.org/10.52180/2073–6487_2024_1_47_64 (in Russian)
15. Tukhtarova, E.K. (2023). Prospects of Russian regions for the transition to a new technological order. Voprosy Ekonomiki, (8), 147–158. EDN: KNXUCT, https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-8-147-158 (in Russian)
16. Khmeleva, G.A. (2023). Technological sovereignty as a tool for ensuring the sustainable development of the region’s economy under sanctions. The Eurasian Scientific Journal, 15(3), https://esj.today/PDF/64ECVN323.pdf. EDN: FUBLUY, https://doi.org/10.15862/64ECVN323 (in Russian)
17. Chernyakova, Yu.D., & Trofimova, G.A. (2020). Economic inequality: analytical tools development. Human Progress, 6(4), 11. EDN: KWUKOM, https://doi.org/10.34709/IM.164.11 (in Russian)
18. Chichkanov, V.P., & Sukharev, O.S. (2021). Ratings in economy management: informativity and performance. Scientific Bulletin of the Military-Industrial Complex of Russia, (3), 72–82. EDN: QKBHQP, https://doi.org/10.52135/2410–4124_2021_3_72 (in Russian)
Review
For citations:
Kulagina N.A., Garipova V.V. Monitoring regional technological development and sovereignty: an organizational mechanism. Economics of Science. 2025;11(4):24-37. (In Russ.) EDN: OJWIDC
Views:
172
JATS XML
Email this article 