The significance of incentive factors for independent experts conducting evaluation of the scientific-technical projects
Abstract
The article presents the results of a survey completed by the executors of projects, financed within the framework of a federal target-oriented programme «Research and development in the priority areas of development of the Russian scientific-technological complex between 2014–2020». Respondents were asked to assess the significance of incentive factors motivating independent experts who conduct the evaluation of the scientific-technical projects. The obtained results demonstrated that according to the respondents, non-material motivation factors are not of a lesser importance than the size of a material incentive for completing the evaluation. This circumstance should be accounted for when organizing the evaluations of scientific-technical projects and special attention should be paid to providing non-material incentives for independent experts.
About the Authors
A. N. Petrov
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical
Programmes, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. B. Rutkovskaja
Foundation for Information Support of Science, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Musatov
Фонда информационного обеспечения науки, г. Москва, Россия
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Regarding motivation of experts (2010) / Independent expert community ArchiDoca. http://arhidoka.ru/вопос-о-мотивации-экспертов.
2. Buharin S. N., Gukasov V. M., Lazarenko N. E. (2011) Theoretical and methodological frameworks of the expertise of fundamental and applied scientific- technical projects // Innovation theory and expertise: scientific works. № 2. P. 58– 66.
3. Garina S. M., Tuzova S. Ju., Lazarenko N. E., Antipov E. E. (2016) Regarding the preparation of applications for subsidies within the framework of Federal target programme «Research and development in the priority areas for development of the scientific-technological complex in Russia between 2014–2020» // Voprosy materialovedenija. № 2. P. 189–190.
4. Karapyshev A. V., Maznev A. A., Mihajlec V. B., Petrov A. N., Radin I. V., Sockova I. S., Shurtakov K. V. (2013) Measuring the value added by the executors to the scientific research and development, cited in the state programmes // Innovations. № 7 (177). P. 105–113.
5. Ivashko S. (2016) Vladimir Fortov: Russian Academy of Sciences Expert–very serious influence on the scientific-technical countries / Xpir, 25.02.2016. https://xpir.ru/articles/Vladimir-Fortov-Ekspert-RAN-ochen-sereznii-uroven- vliyaniya-na-nauchnotehnicheskoe-razvitie-strani.
6. Rajkov A. N. (2010) Normative provision of expert network activity // Informacionnoe obshhestvo. № 5. P. 52–59.
7. Statutory Order of The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation dated 17 March 2016 № 86 (2016) Statement on the motivation and recognition of the activity of members of reference groups, of expert, consulting and coordination or advisory organs under the Russian Ministry of Finance. http://rdocs3.cntd.ru/document/420342848.
8. Mkrtychjan G. A. (2002) Motivational – target components of expert activity in the education sphere // Psychological science and education. № 1. P. 98–104.
Review
For citations:
Petrov A.N., Rutkovskaja I.B., Musatov A.A. The significance of incentive factors for independent experts conducting evaluation of the scientific-technical projects. Economics of Science. 2016;2(3):231-236. (In Russ.)
Views:
765
Email this article 