The Problem of selection of indicators, reflecting the proportion of high-tech products in the global market
Abstract
According to the results of the implementation of the priority «industry of nanosystems» an analysis of the use mechanism of protection of intellectual property rights in the global namespace. Argues that only the intellectual property identificeret prospects for capturing a share of the global market of science-intensive products.
Therefore, to capture and consolidate global technological leadership in the postindustrial society, primarily in the form of its institutionalization in the system of world standards intellectual property. Noted that the reports of UNESCO and the world intellectual property organization (WIPO), published in 2015, the Program of nanoindustry development in the Russian Federation recognized as not effective in the criterion of low patent activity. The data of the patent analysis in three technological fields of nanotechnology, highlighted WIPO’s as mainstream, estimated the share of Russian patents in the world portfolio in each of these areas.The conclusion about the fundamental relevance of this indicator the priority areas as «the number patents with a priority of the Russian Federation, obtained in foreign countries» to assess the country’s share in the global market high-tech products.
About the Authors
V. G. Zinov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia;
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. G. Kurakova
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia;
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. V. Cherchenko
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Project «Strategies for scientific-economical development of Russian Federation up to the year 2035 dated 5 May 2016 (2016) / «Centre of strategic developments» Foundation. http://sntrrf.ru/upload/iblock/456/СНТР%2005.05.2016_редакция%2021.pdf.
2. The meeting of the Science and Education Committee dated 23 November 2016 (2016) Stenograph / Official site of the Russian President. http://kremlin.ru/events/councils/by-council/6/53313.
3. Derwent World Patents Index (2016) Thomson Reuters. http://thomsonreuters.ru/products/derwentworld-patents-index.
4. The chamber has found the transactions of interest by «Rosnano»: http://www.wipo.int/econ_stat/ru/economics/wipr/#full_report
5. Reported about Chubais: what violations are found in «Rosnano» http://www.rbc.EN/technology_and_media/26/04/2016/571e805d9a7947c6781397ea;
6. Scientific-technical report of carrying out applied scientific researches on the theme: «Research aimed at assessing and monitoring performance events for implementation the Presidential initiative «Strategy of nanoindustry development». Number of state registration 114031740018.FEDERAL Directorate of NTP. 2015. M
7. World Intellectual Property Report 2015 – Breakthrough Innovation and Economic growth (2015) / WIPO. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/ru/wipo_pub_944_2015.pdf.
8. UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030 – Executive Summary (2015) / UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235407e.pdf.
9. Nanotechnology Update: Corporations Up Their Spending as Revenues for Nano-enabled Products Increase (2014) / Lux Research. https://portal.luxresearchinc.com/research/report_excerpt/16215.
10. Form No. 1-NANO Information about the shipment of goods, works and services related to nanotechnology.www.gks.ru/form/Form17/p496_2011.do
11. Moyseychik G.I. and Faradzhov T.M. (2015) Technological leadership as a necessary condition for Ho total sovereignty // Bankauski Vesnik. № 9. P. 18–26.
12. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014 (2104) / National Science Foundation. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/etc/nsb1401.pdf.
13. A Strategy for American Innovation: Securing our Economic Growth and Prosperity (2011) The White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/InnovationStrategy.pdf.
14. National strategies for science, technology and innovation (2012) / OECD. http://www.oecd.org/sti/outlook/e-outlook/stipolicyprofiles/stipolicygovernance/nationalstrategiesforsciencetechnologyandinnovation.htm.
15. A lead market initiative for Europe (2007) / Commission of the european communities COM. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/Lex-UriServ.do?uri=COM:2007:0860: FIN: en: PDF.
16. Bagchi A., Mukherjee A. (2014) Technology licensing in a differentiated oligopoly // International Review of Economics & Finance. Vol. 29. Р. 455–465.
17. Chen Y. et al. (2014) Technology licensing in mixed oligopoly // International Review of Economics & Finance. Vol. 31. Р.193–204.
18. The main directions of policy of the Russian Federation in the field of development of innovative system for the period till 2010 (2005) ConsultantPlus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_91912.
19. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 17 Nove3mber 2008 № 1662-p (2008) The concept of long-term socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. it is the period till 2020 / The Ministry of Economic Development and Trade. http://economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/strategicPlanning/concept/indexdocs.
20. Government Executive Order dated 8 Desember 2011 № 2227-р. (2011) Strategy for Innovative Development of the Russian Federation for the period until the year 2020 / Web-site of The Russian Government. http://правительство.рф/gov/ results/17449.
21. Development strategy of science and innovation in the Russian Federation for the period until 2015 (2006) / ConsultantPlus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_101907.
22. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 15 April 2014 № 305 (2014) State program of the Russian Federation «Development of Pharmaceutical and medical tion industry» for 2013–2020» / Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation. http://minpromtorg.gov.ru/common/upload/files/docs/GP_Razvitie_farmatsevticheskoi_i_meditsinskoi_promyshlennosti_na_2013–2020_gody‑1.pdf.
23. The program of nanoindustry development in Russian Federation until 2015 (2008) CondultantPlus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_106174.
24. Bobylev Y.A. (2015) privacy in the Russian science: what do our scientists? / ProAtom. http://www.proatom.ru/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=6328.
25. Kurakova, N.G. et al (2014) National scientific and technological policy «quick response»: recommendations for Russia: analytical report/ N.G. Kurakova, V.G. Zinov, L.A. Tsvetkova, O.A. Eremchenko, A.V. Komarov, V.M. Komarov, A.V. Sorokin,. N. Pavlov, V.A. Kotsyubinsky. – M.: Publishing house «Delo» RANHIGS, 2014. – 160 p.
26. Yakovlev A.R. (2012) Development of nanotechnology market: good or hazard // Modern researches of social problems. № 9 (17). www.sisp.nkras.ru.
27. The assessment methodology of nanotechnology market (2016) / O2Consulting. http://o2consulting.ru/articles/metodologiya-ocenki-rynka-nanotehnologij.
Review
For citations:
Zinov V.G., Kurakova N.G., Cherchenko O.V. The Problem of selection of indicators, reflecting the proportion of high-tech products in the global market. Economics of Science. 2016;2(4):276-292. (In Russ.)
Views:
839
Email this article 