Preview

Economics of Science

Advanced search

THE PROBLEM OF SELECTION OF INDICATORS, REFLECTING THE PROPORTION OF HIGH-TECH PRODUCTS IN THE GLOBAL MARKET

https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-3-2-105-115

Abstract

The analysis of the portfolio of patent documents that do not have a Russian priority, issued to the citizens of the Russian Federation in foreign patent offices, was made. It is shown that, despite the provisions of the Civil and Administrative code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal code of the Russian Federation, the Russian inventors often obtain patents in foreign countries, bypassing the stage of filing of the application with the Russian patent office. Cross-country comparisons of the number of patent applications of residents of other States who have not received the priority of the respective country were made. It is shown that for US residents, for example, the share of such applications does not exceed 7%, while for residents of the Russian Federation accounts for almost 42%. The reasons that lead to an increase in the number of applications of Russian inventors that do not have priority of the Russian Federation and belong to foreign companies were studied. The main reason is the lack of interest from companies of the industrial sector of the Russian Federation for the advanced development.

About the Authors

V. G. Zinov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
Russian Federation


N G. Kurakova
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
Russian Federation


O. V. Cherchenko
Directorate of State Scientific and Technical Programmes.
Russian Federation


References

1. Patent legislation of Canada, Romania, USA, France (1997) / M .: VNIIPI. 357 p.

2. Civil Codex of the Russian Federation, part 4 dated 18 December 2006 № 230-FZ (2006) https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_64629.

3. Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation dated 30 December 2001 № 195-FZ (2001) http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34661.

4. Criminal code of the Russian Federation dated 13 June 1996 № 63-FZ (1996) http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_10699

5. Chernichkina G.N. (2004) The issues of legal protection of patentable results of intellectual activity in the performance of foreign economic transactions with military products // Russian military-legal collection. № 2.

6. Ptichkin S. (1999) Russia on the verge of patent war // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 19.06.1999.

7. Litvintsev G. (2000) All the secrets to sell for a copper penny // Rossiyskaya gazeta. 14.01.2000.

8. Alekhin S. (2003) Scientific secrets from under the counter// Rossiyskaya gazeta. 11.06.2003.

9. Analysis of the processes of privatization of state property in the Russian Federation for the period 1993–2003 (expert analytical event) (2004) / Head of working group – the Chairman of the accounts chamber of the Russian Federation S. V. Stepashin. M.: Olita. 186 p.

10. Statutory Order of The President of Russian Federation dated 1 December 2016 № 642 (2016) About Strategy of scientific and technical development of Russian Federation / Garant. http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71451998.

11. Lopatin V.N. (2015) Risk management of intellectual property in innovative projects of metallurgy and engineering: the report / Ekaterinburg. 04.06.2015. http://www.rniiis.ru/news/comentarii.html.

12. Miridonov А. (2016) The increase in patenting is a strange phenomenon // Kommersant FM. 21.07.2016. http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3043806.


Review

For citations:


Zinov V.G., Kurakova N.G., Cherchenko O.V. THE PROBLEM OF SELECTION OF INDICATORS, REFLECTING THE PROPORTION OF HIGH-TECH PRODUCTS IN THE GLOBAL MARKET. Economics of Science. 2017;3(2):105-115. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-3-2-105-115

Views: 706


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2410-132X (Print)
ISSN 2949-4680 (Online)