TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED COMPANY: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF STATUS DETERMINATION
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-4-1-30-46
Abstract
About the Author
O. A. YeremchenkoRussian Federation
Moscow.
References
1. Support for private high-tech companies – leaders of the «National Champions» (2018) / RVC. https:// www.rvc.ru/eco/p2/strategic_agenda/102912.
2. Jaegers T., Lipp-Lingua C., Amil D. (2013) Hightechnology and medium-high technology industries main drivers of EU-27’s industrial growth // Eurosts. Statistics in Focus 1/2013. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Archive:High-technology_versus_low-technology_manufacturing#cite_note-2.
3. The 2017 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard (2018) / European Commission – Joint Research Centre. http://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/scoreboard17.html.
4. The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.
5. HOLT (2018) / Credit Suisse. 14.02.2018. https:// www.credit-suisse.com/sites/holt/en.html.
6. Jeff D., Gregersen H. (2017) How We Rank The Most Innovative Companies 2017 // Forbes. 08.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/innovatorsdna/2017/08/08/how-we-rank-the-mostinnovative-companies-2017/#69cb7bdd5c46.
7. Kauflin J. (2017) The World’s Most Innovative Growth Companies 2017 // Forbes. 17.05.2017. https:// www.forbes.com/sites/jeffkauflin/2017/05/17/the-worlds-most-innovative-growthcompanies-2017/#b2731a645ca7.
8. Methodology. 2017 Top 100 Global Innovators (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. http://top100innovators.clarivate.com/content/methodology.
9. Top 100 Global Innovator 2017 (2018) / Clarivate Analytics. https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Clarivate-Analytics-2017Top-100-Global-Innovators.pdf.
10. 50 Smartest Companies 2017 (2018) / MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/lists/companies/2017.
11. Strategy&’s 2017 Global Innovation 1000 study Methodology (2018) / Pw C. https:// www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000UK#VisualTabs3.
12. The Most Innovative Companies 2018 (2018) / Boston Consulting Group. http://image-src.bcg.com/Images/BCG-Most-Innovative-CompaniesJan-2018_tcm27–180700.pdf.
13. Drucker Institute’s company ranking – 2017 (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankings-2017.
14. Methodology for the Management Top 250 Company Rankings (2017) / The Wall Street Journal. 05.12.2017. https://www.wsj.com/articles/methodology-for-the-management-top-250company-rankings-1512482700.
15. Principles underlying The Drucker Institute’s company ranking (2018) / Drucker Institute. 12.02.2018. http://www.drucker.institute/rankingsprinciples.
16. The Most Innovative Companies (2017) / Forbes. 12.08.2017. https://www.forbes.com/innovativecompanies/#36acb6fc1d65.
17. Rating of innovative regions of Russia: version 2017 (2018) / AIRR. http://www.i-regions.org/images/files/airr17.pdf.
18. TechUp Rating 2017. Methodology (2018) / TechUp. http://www.ratingtechup.ru/about/methodology.
Review
For citations:
Yeremchenko O.A. TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED COMPANY: METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF STATUS DETERMINATION. Economics of Science. 2018;4(1):30-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2017-4-1-30-46