On the development of mechanisms and tools for expanding the value of full-cycle science and technology projects using the TPRL methodology

The article proposes institutional tools for solving the problem of forming a competitive and well-functioning sector of applied research and development. The proposed approaches are based on using the methodology of integrated assessment of scientific and technological projects, the so-called. TPRL methodologies as the basis for designing interfaces between stages of fullcycle projects that can ensure the seamless integration of full-cycle projects between various development institutions. To increase the value of the results of scientific and technological projects it was proposed to use a network of technology brokers. The use of professional competences of techno-brokers is confirmed by the positive experience of the Program for the Development and Commercialization of Projects of the Federal Targeted Program “Research and Development in Priority Areas of the Scientific and Technological Complex of Russia for 2014–2020” (hereinafter the Federal Target Program) and the practice of similar domestic and foreign networks. The results and conclusions obtained in the article can be applied in the planning and coordination bodies of various development institutions to increase the effectiveness of their work in terms of creating working mechanisms for the implementation of the implementation of full-cycle projects.

1. Zinov V.G., Shurtakov K.V., Komarov A.V. (2018) On the projects of the full cycle // Innovations – in print.

2. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 1 December 2016 № 642 (2016) On the Strategy for the Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation / Official site of the President of Russia. http://kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449.

3. Petrov A.N., Varlamov K.V., Komarov A.V., Matveev D.A. (2017) The effectiveness of development institutions. The paradigm shift of development institutions in the medium term // The Economics of Science. V. 3. № 4. P. 230–239.

4. Gorbatova А. (2015) The government allowed state contractor to take unused intellectual property from the state // Science and Technologies of the Russian Federation. http://www.strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=221&d_no=108055#.W7YSGXszapp.

5. Petrov A.N., Sartori A.V., Filimonov A.V. (2016) Comprehensive assessment of the state of scientific and technical projects through the level of technology readiness // The Economics of Science. V. 2. № 4. P. 244–260.

6. Komarov A.V., Petrov A.N., Sartori A.V. (2018) Model of complex assessment of technological readiness of innovative scientific and technological projects // The Economics of Science. V. 4. № 1. P. 47–57.

7. Zhebel V.V., Komarov A.V., Komarov K.A., Shurtakov K.V. (2018) Software for a comprehensive assessment of the technological readiness of innovative scientific and technological projects // The Economics of Science. V. 4.

8. Komarov A.V., Sleptsova M.A., Chechetkin E.V., Shurtakov K.V., Tretyakova M.V.(2017) Evaluation of the team of performers of a scientific and technical project // Economics of Science. V. 3. № 4. P. 250–261.

9. Belbin R.M. (2003) Types of roles in management teams. Gippo. 240 p.

10. Slavin B. (2014) Modern expert networks // Open systems. DBMS.

11. Hargadon E. (2007) Innovation Management. Experience of leading companies. Moscow: Publishing house Williams.

12. Gubanov D.A., Korgin N. A., Novikov D. A., Raikov A.N. (2011) Network Expertise, 2nd ed. (Edited by D.A. Novikov, Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prof. A.N. Raikov). Moscow: Egves. 166 p.

13. Scientific, technical and technological expertise of projects (2016) Analysis of the Russian market // ANO «Information Culture».

14. Empson R. (2011) Free Startup Docs: How Much Equity Should Advisors Get? / TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2011/09/22/free-startup-docs-how-much-equityshould-advisors-get/.

15. Session of the Council for Science and Education dated 23 November 2016 (2016) / Official site of the President of Russia. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/53313.

16. Baird R., Bhattacharyya B. (2017) Why Most Entrepreneurs Hate Fundraising – And How to Fix It // A Medium Corporation – Village Capital. https://medium.com/villagecapital/entrepreneurs-and-vcs-need-to-be-more-precisein-the-way-they-talk-to-each-other-3e714e7a5245.