A practice of developing nano technologies: mistakes of China and recommendations for Russia
Abstract
Both Chinese and Russian nano technology fields were created with an active involvement of State Institutes. Russian and Chinese nano technology fields share a series of general common traits as well as certain issues. On the basis of empirical data this article will characterize the measures used in China for stimulating the development of nano technology sector and the sphere of nano research, which efficiency is rather questionable. This is so-called no-go theorems, pointing the direction which shouldn't be followed (at least using the same method) for developing nano technologies in Russia.
About the Author
P. N. Pavlov
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
старший научный сотрудник,
Institute of applied Economic research,
Moscow, Russia
References
1. Куракова Н.Г., Зинов В.Г., Цветкова Л.А., Еремченко О.А., Комарова А.В., Комаров В.М., Сорокина А.В., Павлов П.Н., Коцюбинский В.А. (2014) Национальная научно-технологическая политика «быстрого реагирования»: рекомендации для России: аналитический доклад. М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС. 160 с.
2. Министерство науки и технологий Китая (2001) Национальная стратегия развития нанотехнологий 2001–2010 (GuoJiaNaMiKeJiFaZhanGangYao, 2001–2010). URL: http://www.most.gov.cn/fggw/zfwj/zfwj2001/200512/t20051214_55037.htm.
3. Bai C.L. (2005) Ascent of nanoscience in China//Science. № 309. P. 61–63.
4. Brahic C. (2005) China 'encroaches on US nanotech lead'//SciDev. Net. http://www.scidev.net/global/technology/news/china-encroaches-on-us-nanotech-lead.html
5. Braun T., Schubert A., Zsindely S. (1997) Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance//Scientometrics. № 38 (2). P. 321–325.
6. David P. (1985) Clio and the Economics of QWERTY//American Economic Review: 332.
7. Guan J., Ma N. (2007) China's emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology. A comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience 'giants'//Research Policy. № 36. P. 880–886.
8. Huang C., Wu Y. (2012) State-led Technological Development: A Case of China's Nanotechnology Development//World Development. V. 40. № 5. P. 970–982.
9. Jin B., Rousseau R. (2004) Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators inChina/In: Moed H.F., Glanzel W., Schmoch U. (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht etc. — P. 497–514.
10. King D.A. (2004) The scientific impact of Nations//Nature. № 430. P. 311–316.
11. Kostoff R.N. (2004) The (Scientific) Wealth of Nations//The Scientist. № 18(18). P. 10.
12. Leydesdorff L., Zhou P. (2005) Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the worldsystem of science?//Scientometrics. № 63(3). P. 617–630.
13. Liu Y.E., Zhang Y., Yang J.A., Zhang J.H., & Han X.C. (2007) Gao Deng Xue Xiao Zhuan Li ShiShi Xian Zhuang De Diao Yan Yu Si Kao (Survey and thoughts on patent utilization in universities)//Ke Yan Yu Fa Zhan Guan Li (R&D Management). № 19(1). — P. 112–119.
14. Lux Research (2008) Nanomaterials state of the market Q3 2008: Stealth success, broad impact/ New York, The US: Lux Research Inc.
15. Meyer M., Persson O. (1998) Nanotechnology — interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application//Scientometrics. № 42(2). P. 195–205.
16. Shapira P., & Wang J. (2009) From lab to market? Strategies and issues in the commercialization of nanotechnology in China//Asian Business and Management. № 8(4). P. 461–489.
17. Zhou P. and Leydesdorff L. (2006) The emergence of China as a leading nation in science//Research Policy. № 35. P. 83–104.
Review
For citations:
Pavlov P.N. A practice of developing nano technologies: mistakes of China and recommendations for Russia. Economics of Science. 2015;1(1):72-80. (In Russ.)
Views:
858
Email this article 