University science. Internal possibilities of stimulating scientific activity in Russian universities
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2019-5-2-129-142
Abstract
The statistics of research funding are reviewed, the experience of organizing research activities in Russian universities is summarized, and a model of its system support is proposed by the university itself. It is stated that in university science there is a “customer crisis”: the demand of the business sector does not provide the necessary volume of large and long-term orders for scientific research and studies rely mainly on the state budget. Organizational measures are proposed for a gradual transition from teaching to research with step-by-step confirmation of productivity: the creation of a new university subject – a “scientific unit” consisting of two or more employees, regardless of their academic title, with administrative rights and corresponding responsibility.
About the Authors
A. P. Sukhodolov
Baikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
11 Lenin Str., Irkutsk, 664003
I. V. Anokhov
Baikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
11 Lenin Str., Irkutsk, 664003
Е. О. Mihalyova
Baikal State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
11 Lenin Str., Irkutsk, 664003
References
1. Marginson S.(2015) The role of the state in university science: a comparative analysis of Russia and China // Bulletin of international organizations. V. 10. №1. P. 7–30.
2. Twelve Solutions for New Education (2018) Report by the Center for Strategic Research and the Higher School of Economics. https://www.hse.ru/data/2018/04/06/1164671180/Doklad_obrazovanie_Web.pdf.
3. Tagarov B.Zh.(2018) The behavior of subjects of the education market in the conditions of asymmetric information // Creative Economy. V. 12. №5. P. 607–618.
4. Tagarov B.Zh.(2018) Problems of the development of research activities in Russia in the transition to a knowledge economy // Economy and Entrepreneurship. №5 (94). P. 189–194.
5. Tagarov B.Zh.(2018) The main directions of development of the online education market in Russia // Creative Economy. V. 12. №8. P. 1201–1212.
6. Tagarov B.Zh., Tagarov Zh.Z.(2018) Features of Informational Inequality in the Modern Economy // Creative Economy. V. 12. №5. P. 543–554.
7. Shobodoeva А.V.(2017) The development of the concept of «information security» in the scientific and legal field of Russia // News of the Baikal State University. V. 27. №1. C. 73–78.
8. Indicators of science: 2018: statistical collection (2018) / N. V. Gorodnikova, L. M. Gokhberg, K. A. Ditkovsky, et al. Moscow: HSE. 320 p.
9. Higher School of Economics (2019) / HSE. https://www.hse.ru.
10. Science Technology Innovation (2019) / HSE. https://issek.hse.ru/news/211444213.html.
11. Soria V.H.A., Castillo G.M.(2018) Teaching and research at the national university of San Juan (1994–2015): impact of the incentive program to teachers-researchers and the career of the scientific researcher of CONICET // Prometeicarevista de filosofia y ciencias. №16. P. 57–77.
12. Matlakiewicz P., Matuszak P., Grodzicki G. (2016) Results of the commercialisation of scientific research in the light of experience gained at the nicolaus copernicus university centre for technology transfer // Polish hyperbaric research. V. 54. №1. P. 37–39.
13. Komarov V.M., Barinova V.A., Zemtsov S.P. (2016) Approaches to the formation of the technological valley of Moscow State University. Mv Lomonosov // The Economics of Science. №2. P. 120–129.
14. Mamontov M.S.(2016) An integrated approach to managing the grant activity of the department at the university // Bulletin of the Mari State University. №1. P. 35–38.
15. Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (2019) / MIPT. https://mipt.ru.
16. National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (2019) / MEPhI. https://mephi.ru.
17. Tomsk State University (2019) / TSU. http://www.tsu.ru.
18. Wittenberg J., Elings M. (2017) Building a Research Data Management Service at the University of California, Berkeley: A tale of collaboration // IFLA journal-international federation of library associations. V. 43(1). Р. 89–97.
19. Riechert M., Roberson O., Wastl J.(2017) Research information standards adoption: Development of a visual insight tool at the University of Cambridge // Procedia Computer Science. V. 106. P. 39–46.
20. Fedotova O.D., Mareev V.V., Karpova G.F. (2015) Stimulating the publication activity of teachers as a way for Russian universities to become part of the system of world-wide relations in the field of science and education // Naukovedenie. №6. P. 1–9.
21. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 26 November 2012 №2190-r (2012) On approving the Program for the gradual improvement of the wage system in state (municipal) institutions for 2012–2018 / Consultant Plus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_138313.
22. Gershman M.A., Kuznetsova T.E.(2013) Effective contract in science: model parameters // Forsight. №3. P. 26–36.
23. Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia dated 26 April 2013 №167n (2013) On approving recommendations on the formalization of labor relations with an employee of a state (municipal) institution when introducing an effective contract / Consultant Plus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_149028.
24. Lagun A.A., Shilova I.N.(2015) Integration of educational and scientific activities in a higher educational institution: problems and solutions // Milk-Economic Journal. №2 (18). P. 114–122.
25. Dutta R., Pashak T.J., McCullough J.D., Weaver J.S., Heron M.R. (2019) From Consumers to Producers: Three Phases in the Research Journey With Undergraduates at a Regional University / Front. Psychol. 9:2770.
26. Federal Law of the Russian Federation dated 23 August 1996 №127-FZ (1996) On Science and State Science and Technology Policy / Consultant Plus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_11507.
27. Fursov А.I.(2013) «Normal science» versus «analytics». http://andreyfursov.ru/news/normalnaja_nauka_versus_analitika/2013-05-01-286.
28. St. Petersburg State University (2019) / SPSU. https://spbu.ru.
29. Dunbar G.L.(2019) Strategies to Maximize the Involvement of Undergraduates in Publishable Research at an R2 University / Front. Psychol. 10:214.
Review
For citations:
Sukhodolov A.P., Anokhov I.V., Mihalyova Е.О. University science. Internal possibilities of stimulating scientific activity in Russian universities. Economics of Science. 2019;5(2):129-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2019-5-2-129-142
Views:
639
Email this article 