A formalized evolution of the efficiency of regional higher education systems through the prism of the relationship of inputs and outputs of flow values
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2019-5-4-2478-257
Abstract
This study proposes approaches aimed at methodological support for solving the problem of formalized evaluation of the effectiveness of regional higher education systems. The main feature of the work is the use of methods of comparison of «input» and «output» stream values characterizing the parameters of the functioning of the regional higher school. Using the approaches of regulation of the analyzed indicators and the subsequent development on this basis of indices of efficiency, are multi-component calculations that assess the level of generation output 1 unit output parameter, which identifies the financial-economic component of the regional high school. As a result of the implemented assessments, the regions of the Volga Federal district with moderate and strong positions in the sphere of generated effects characterizing their effectiveness in comparison with the invested financial resources are identified.
About the Authors
M. R. Safiullin
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Abdukaeva
Center for Advanced Economic Research of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. V. Yurkov
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Belyakov S. A., Klyachko T. L. (2015) Methodology for assessing the contribution of education to the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation and its subjects. Moscow: RANEPA. 60 p.
2. Kuzminov Ya.I., Semenov D. S., Frumin I. D. (2013) The structure of the university network: from the Soviet to the Russian «master plan» // Issues of Education. № . 4. P. 8–63.
3. Leshukov O., Platonova D., Semyonov D. (2015) Does Competition Matter? Efficiency of Regional Higher Education Systems and Competition: Case of Russia // Working papers by NRU Higher School of Economics. Series EDU «Education». № WP BRP 29/EDU/2015.
4. Douglass J. A. (2016) The New Flagship University: Changing the Paradigm from Global Ranking to National Relevancy / US: Palgrave Macmillan. 256 p.
5. Huggins R., Johnston A. (2009) Impact of Higher Education Institutions on Regional Economies Initiative // Cardiff metropolitan university. https://ewds. strath.ac.uk/Portals/8/Huggins%20and%20Johnston%20 -%20Discussion%20Paper.pdf.
6. Teixeira P., Rocha V., Biscaia R., Cardoso M. F. (2014) Policy changes, marketization trends and spatial dispersion in European Higher Education: Comparing public and private sectors, Cambridge Journal of Regions // Economy and Society, special issue «Universities in Crisis». № 7 (2). Р. 271–288.
7. QS University Rankings | Top Universities (2017) / QS. https://www.topuniversities.com/universityrankings.
8. The Global Entrepreneurial University Metrics initiative (2019) / Triple Helix Association. https://www. triplehelixassociation.org/news/the-global-entrepreneurial-university-metrics-initiative.
9. Millot B. (2015) International rankings: Universities vs. higher education systems // International Journal of Educational Development. V. 40. Р. 156–165.
10. The main computer center (2019) http://indicators. miccedu.ru/monitoring.
11. Safiullin M. R., Safiullin N. Z., Safiullin L. N. (2013) Estimation of competitiveness of Russian regions by economic activity // World Applied Sciences Journal. V. 27. P. 207–211.
12. Tornatzky L. G., Rideout E. C. (2014) Innovation U2.0 Reinventing University Roles in a Knowledge Economy / Innovation U2.0. http://www. innovation-u. com/InnovU-2.0_rev-12-14-14.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Safiullin M.R., Abdukaeva A.A., Yurkov D.V. A formalized evolution of the efficiency of regional higher education systems through the prism of the relationship of inputs and outputs of flow values. Economics of Science. 2019;5(4):248-257. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2019-5-4-2478-257
Views:
690
Email this article 