Trace of the effect of social innovation in patent data
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2019-5-4-277-302
Abstract
It is proposed to consider as a subtype of social innovation a significant change in the interaction of the scientific team that has arisen as a result of a scientific or scientific-technical project, generating specific conditions for obtaining and (or) developing new knowledge and, possibly, the economic benefits of such a change. A hypothesis has been put forward that the use of patent data characterizing individual results of scientific and technical activity allows us to identify scientific or scientific and technical projects and their results, which have become drivers of the growth of social innovations or social effects of innovation, which consist in expanding the boundaries of the previous scientific school of performers or creating new scientific school, or in expanding the boundaries of research. The hypothesis was tested on a number of completed projects of the federal target program «Research and Development in Priority Directions for the Development of the Scientific and Technological Complex of Russia for 2014–2020».
About the Authors
D. P. FedulkinRussian Federation
O. V. Cherchenko
Russian Federation
References
1. Linton J. (2018) Quiet Contributors: The Role of the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences in Innovation // Foresight and STI Governance. V. 12. № 3. P. 6–12.
2. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition (2005) The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities / OECD-Eurostat. OECD Publishing, Paris.
3. Anzola-Roman P., Bayona-Saez C., García-Marco T. (2018) Organizational innovation, internal R&D and externally sourced innovation practices: Effects on technological innovation outcomes Author links open overlay panel // Journal of Business Research. V. 91. P. 233–247.
4. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation, 4th Edition (2018) The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities / OECD-Eurostat. OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat, Luxembourg.
5. Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russia dated 20 September 2018 № 3718 (2018) Оn approval of the Methodology for assessing the achievement of target indicators (indicators) of the effectiveness of the implementation of complex projects / ConsultantPlus. http://www.consultant. ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_313094.
6. Have R., Rubalcaba L. (2016) Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? // Research Policy. V. 45. Is. 9. P. 1923–1935.
7. Moulaert F., Martinelli F., Swyngedouw E., Gonzalez S. (2005) Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation // Urban Stud. V. 42. P. 1969–1990.
8. Guide to Social Innovation (2013) / European Commission. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ documents/20182/84453/Guide_to_Social_Innovation.pdf.
9. Mumford M. D. (2002) Social Innovation: Ten Cases From Benjamin Franklin, Creativity // Research Journal. V. 14. Is. 2. P. 253–266.
10. Howaldt J., Schwarz M. (2010) Social Innovation: Concepts, Research Fields and International Trends / IMA/ZLW.
11. Cajaiba-Santana G. (2014) Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. V. 82. P. 42–51.
12. Civil Code of the Russian Federation (1994) / ConsultantPlus. http://www.consultant.ru/document/ cons_doc_LAW_5142.
13. The determination of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated 15 June 2009 № ВАС-6989/09 (2009) In the case № А40– 33196/08-29-363.
14. Lam A. (2005) Organizational innovation – Chapter 5 / The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
15. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated 21 May 2013 № 426 (2013) On the federal target program «Research and development in priority areas for the development of the scientific and technological complex of Russia for 2014–2020» / Garant. http://base.garant. ru/70385450.
16. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 07 July 2011 № 899 (2011) On the approval of priority areas for the development of science, technology and technology in the Russian Federation and the list of critical technologies of the Russian Federation / Garant. http://base.garant. ru/55171684.
17. Stirling A. (2007) A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society / The Royal society publishing. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsif.2007.0213.
18. The passport of the national project «Science» (2018) Approved by the Presidium of the Presidential Council for Strategic Development and National Projects (Minutes 24 December 2018 № 16) / Official website of the Government of Russia. http:// static.government.ru/media/files/vCAoi8zEXRVSuy2Yk7D8hvQbpbUSwO8y.pdf.
19. Komarov A. V., Petrov A. N., Sartori A. V. (2018) Model for a comprehensive assessment of the technological readiness of innovative scientific and technological projects // The Economics of Science. V. 4. № 1. P. 47–57.
Review
For citations:
Fedulkin D.P., Cherchenko O.V. Trace of the effect of social innovation in patent data. Economics of Science. 2019;5(4):277-302. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2019-5-4-277-302