Application of the methodology of readiness levels for the lean development of digital twins of complex engineering systems
https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2020-6-1-2-62-74
Abstract
Due to the complexity of full-scale object modeling and the need to use advanced computing technologies, the digital twin development process may require significant time, financial and human resources. Therefore, it is important for lean management of digital twin development to classify them by functionality, determine the current technology readiness level (TRL), and monitor its dynamics over short periods of time. A description of the life cycle stages of digital twins virtual models and adapted conditions to achieve technology readiness level are proposed. The use of the formalized TRL metric for detailed project planning by specific results reduces the development time, costs, and improves the quality of the results.
About the Authors
A. V. Sartori
JSC «Science and Innovations»
Russian Federation
Staromonetnyj lane, 26, Moscow, 119180
Russian Federation
Staromonetnyj lane, 26, Moscow, 119180
V. A. Pershukov
Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation
Russian Federation
Bolshaya Ordynka Str., 24, Moscow, 119017
Russian Federation
Bolshaya Ordynka Str., 24, Moscow, 119017
N. A. Mosunova
Nuclear safety institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Bolshaya Tul’skaya Str., 52, Moscow, 115191
Russian Federation
Bolshaya Tul’skaya Str., 52, Moscow, 115191
N. M. Mantsevich
JSC «Science and Innovations»
Russian Federation
Staromonetnyj lane, 26, Moscow, 119180
Russian Federation
Staromonetnyj lane, 26, Moscow, 119180
References
1. Gartner Survey Reveals Digital Twins Are Entering Mainstream Use (2019) / Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-02-20-gartner-survey-reveals-digital-twins-are-en-tering-mai.
2. Nuclear Innovation 2050 (2019) / Nuclear Energy Agency. https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/ni2050.
3. Sartori A. V., Ilyina N. A., Mantsevich N. M. (2019) The concept of assessing the potential for the commercialization of R&D results in scientific organizations and universities // Higher Education Today. № 6. P. 11–25.
4. Sartori A. V., Gareev A. R., Ilyina N. A., Mantsevich N. M. (2020) Application of the approach of readiness levels for various subject areas in lean R&D // The Economics of Science. V. 6. № 1–2. P. 118–134.
5. Komrakov A. V., Sukhorukov A. I. (2017) The concept of the digital twin in the management of the life cycle of industrial facilities // Scientific idea. № 3 (3).
6. Digital twin (2019) / Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_twin.
7. Fei Tao et al. (2018) Digital twin-driven product design framework // International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 57. Is. 12. P. 3935–3953.
8. Grieves M. (2014) Digital Twin: Manufacturing Excellence through Virtual Factory Replication / LLC. 7 p.
9. Factory of digital transformation. Digital twin of industrial equipment and technological processes (2019) / Factory of digital transformation. https://digitaltwin.ru/media/resources/DTF_Broshure.pdf.
10. GE Digital Twin: Analytic Engine for the Digital Power Plant (2016) / General Electric. 30 p.
11. GOST 33855–2016 (2016) Justification of equipment safety. Recommendations for the preparation / Techexpert. http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200146269.
12. Bolshov L. A., Strizhev V. F. (2014) Modern computer codes – a tool for safety analysis and justification. Presentation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rC9nKxDrKaU.
13. Sartori A. V., Sushkov P. V., Mantsevich N. M. (2018) Lean R&D School: the practice of training researchers at universities using an endowment fund // Higher Education Today. № 7. P. 2–9.
14. Petrov A. N., Sartori A. V., Filimonov A. V. (2016) A comprehensive assessment of the state of scientific and technical projects through the level of technology readiness // The Economics of Science. V. 2. № 4. P. 244–260.
15. Technology readiness levels (TRL) (2014) Horizon 2020 – work programme 2014–2015 General Annexes / European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/annexes/h2020-wp1415-annex-g-trl_en.pdf.
16. Graettinger C. P., Caroline P. et al. (2002) Using the Technology Readiness Levels Scale to Support Technology Management in the DOD’s ATD/STO Environments / Carnegie Mellon University. 41 p.
17. Mankins J. C. (1995) Technology readiness levels / Artemis Innovation. http://www.artemisinnovation.com/images/TRL_White_Paper_2004-Edited.pdf.
18. The TRL Scale as a Research & Innovation Policy Tool (2014) / EARTO Recommendations. http://www.earto.eu/fileadmin/content/03_Publications/The_TRL_Scale_as_a_R_I_Policy_Tool_-_EARTO_Recommendations_-_Final.pdf.
19. DOE (2015) / National Energy Technology Laboratory-2015/1710. Technology Readiness Assessment – Clean Coal Research Program. 144 р.
20. Sartori A. V., Sushkov P. V., Mantsevich N. M. (2020) The principles of lean research and development management based on the methodology of the innovation project readiness levels // The Economics of Science. V. 6. № 1–2. P. 22–34.
Review
For citations:
Sartori A.V., Pershukov V.A., Mosunova N.A., Mantsevich N.M. Application of the methodology of readiness levels for the lean development of digital twins of complex engineering systems. Economics of Science. 2020;6(1-2):62-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2020-6-1-2-62-74
Views:
1016
Email this article 