Development of a Telegram Bot to Determine the Level of Technological Readiness
D. I. Suntsova,
V. A. Pavlov,
Z. V. Makarenko,
P. P. Bakholdin,
A. S. Politsinsky,
A. S. Kremlev,
A. A. Margun https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-1-22-30
Abstract
The article proposes a Telegram bot to automate the process of assessing the readiness level of the technology. Flowcharts reflecting the algorithm of the bot, and images demonstrating the appearance of its interface are presented. To confirm the correct operation of the Telegram bot, a random project was taken, its main characteristics were highlighted, and based on them, a conclusion about the technology readiness level was made in two ways: by expert evaluation in accordance with the national standard and using a bot running on a personal computer with the Windows operating system and on a mobile device with the Android operating system. With equal input data, the conclusion about the readiness level of the technology obtained at the output of the algorithm coincides with the result of the expert assessment. It is proposed to use the Telegram bot as a source of an additional opinion about the level of technological readiness of the project.
Supporting agencies: The research is supported by the project «Artificial Intelligence Methods for Cyber-Physical Systems» (No. 620164).
About the Authors
D. I. Suntsova
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Darya I. Suntsova – Engineer of the Cyber-Physical Systems Laboratory
197101, Saint-Petersburg, Kronverksky Pr., 49, bldg. A
V. A. Pavlov
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor A. Pavlov – Engineer of the Cyber-Physical Systems Laboratory
197101, Saint-Petersburg, Kronverksky Pr., 49, bldg. A
Z. V. Makarenko
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zinaida V. Makarenko – Engineer of the Cyber-Physical Systems Laboratory
197101, Saint-Petersburg, Kronverksky Pr., 49, bldg. A
P. P. Bakholdin
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Petr P. Bakholdin – Engineer of the Cyber-Physical Systems Laboratory
197101, Saint-Petersburg, Kronverksky Pr., 49, bldg. A
A. S. Politsinsky
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Politsinsky – Engineer of the Cyber-Physical Systems Laboratory
197101, Saint-Petersburg, Kronverksky Pr., 49, bldg. A
A. S. Kremlev
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem S. Kremlev – Docent of the Faculty of Control Systems and Robotics
Scopus Author ID: 8670923900
197101, Saint-Petersburg, Kronverksky Pr., 49, bldg. A
A. A. Margun
ITMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Margun – Docent of the Faculty of Control Systems and Robotics
Scopus Author ID: 55521791600
197101, Saint-Petersburg, Kronverksky Pr., 49, bldg. A
References
1. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated 01.12.2016 No. 642 (2016) Strategy for the Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation / Official website of the President of Russia. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/bank/41449. (In Russ.)
2. Burkov E.A., Paderno P.I., Sattorov F.E., Tolkacheva E.A. (2021) Methodological Support of the Working Group in Solving the Problem of Predicting the Results of a Classification Examination // Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. 21(3):426–432. (In Russ.)
3. Komarov A.V., Pikhtar A.N., Grinevsky I.V., Komarov K.A., Golitsyn L.V. (2021) A Conceptual Model for Assessing the Technological Readiness of a R&D Project and its Potential at the Early Stages of Development // The Economics of Science. 7(2):111–134. (In Russ.)
4. Sartori A.V., Sushkov P.V., Mantsevich N.M. (2020) The Principles of Lean Research and Development Management Based on the Methodology of the Innovation Project Readiness Levels // The Economics of Science. 6(1–2):22–34. (In Russ.)
5. Sartori A.V., Gareev A.R., Ilyina N.A., Mantsevich N.M. (2020) Application of the Approach of Readiness Levels for Various Subject Areas in Lean R&D // The Economics of Science. 6(1–2):118–134. (In Russ.)
6. Hicks B., Larsson A., Culley S., Larsson T. (2009) A Methodology for Evaluating Technology Readiness During Product Development / International Conference of Engineering Design. Stanford, USA.
7. Sauser B., Verma D., Ramírez-Márquez J., Gove R. (2006) From TRL to SRL: The Concept of Systems Readiness Levels / Conference on Systems Engineering Research. Los Angeles, CA, USA.
8. Graettinger C.P., Caroline P. et al. (2002) Using the Technology Readiness Levels Scale to Support Technology Management in the DOD’s ATD/STO Environments / Carnegie Mellon University. 41 p.
9. Hirshorn S., Sharon J. (2016) Final Report of the NASA Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Study Team / NASA. 63 p.
10. DAU Tools (2022) https://www.dau.edu/cop/stm/lists/tools/allitems.aspx.
11. Dmitrenko I.P. (2016) A Variant of the Calculator of Readiness Levels of High-Precision Technologies // Actual Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. 12–1:103–107. (In Russ.)
12. Dmitrenko I.P. (2017) A Variant of the Calculator of Readiness Levels of High-Precision Technologies Based on an Open Software Product // Actual Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences. 1–1:64–66. (In Russ.)
13. Xavier Jr A., Veloso A., Souza J., Kaled Cás P., Cappelletti C. (2020) AEB Online Calculator for Assessing Technology Maturity: IMATEC // Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management. 12.
14. Altunok T., Cakmak T. (2010) A technology readiness levels (TRLs) calculator software for systems engineering and technology management tool // Advances in Engineering Software. 41:769–778.
15. Jebel’ V.V., Komarov A.V., Komarov K.A., Shurtakov K.V. (2018) Software for Integrated Assessment of Technological Readiness of Innovative Scientific and Technological Projects // The Economics of Science. 4(1):58–68. (In Russ.)
16. Bukharin S.N., Gukasov V.M., Lazarenko N.E. (2011) Theoretical and Methodological Foundations Examination of Fundamental and Applied Scientific Technical Projects // Innovation and Expertise. 2(7):58–66. (In Russ.)
17. GOST R58048–2017 (2017) Technology transfer. Methodological guidelines for assessing the level of maturity of technologies / Kodeks. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200158331. (In Russ.)
18. Kravets A.G., Drobotov A.S. (2011) The Use of Simulation Modeling to Assess the Quality of Business Plans for Innovative Projects // Scientific and Technical Journal of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics. 2(72). (In Russ.)
19. GOST R56861–2016 (2016) Life cycle management system. Development of the product concept and technologies. General provisions / Kodeks. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200132491. (In Russ.)
20. GOST R56862–2016 (2016) Life cycle management system. Product concept and technology development. Terms and definitions / Kodeks. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200132492. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Suntsova D.I., Pavlov V.A., Makarenko Z.V., Bakholdin P.P., Politsinsky A.S., Kremlev A.S., Margun A.A. Development of a Telegram Bot to Determine the Level of Technological Readiness. Economics of Science. 2022;8(1):22-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-1-22-30
Views:
699
Email this article 