Уровни цифровой зрелости региональной власти

Указ Президента России № 1014 определил одним из важнейших показателей эффективности деятельности высших должностных лиц субъектов Российской Федерации «цифровую зрелость государственного и муниципального управления». Особенно важным унифицированная оценка цифровой зрелости управления представляется на уровне органов региональной власти. Целью исследования является разработка уровней цифровой зрелости региональной власти. В качестве методов исследования были применены метод системного логического анализа и структурно-функциональный подход к анализу региональных команд управления и функций региональных управленцев. Информационную базу исследования составили статьи, проиндексированные в международной базе данных Science Direct и российской научной электронной библиотеке eLIBRARY, найденные с использованием поискового образа «уровни цифровой зрелости региональной власти». В результате проведенного исследования разработана типология шести уровней цифровой зрелости органов региональной власти: отсутствие, существование, применение, использование цифровых технологий, замещение управленческих функций цифровыми технологиями, автономность управления регионом без участия человека. Показана возможность объективного анализа цифровой зрелости по оценке доли принимаемых управленческих решений на основе цифровых технологий. Проанализировано изменение роли руководителей региона в процессе принятия управленческих решений путем внедрения цифровых технологий от принятия решений без учета цифровизации до становления архитектором цифровых процессов и технологий. Показано, что определение уровней цифровой зрелости органов регионального управления может быть проведено методом трансакционной томографии. Результаты исследования развивают теорию оценки процессов цифровизации органов управления территориями.

1. Abramov, V.I., & Andreev, V.D. (2022). Assessment of the digital maturity of the public administration in the regions: the US experience and development in Russia. Informatization in the Digital Economy, 3(2), 43–62. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.18334/ide.3.2.115106

2. Abramov, V.I., & Andreev, V.D. (2023). Digital ecosystem of the region: Structural components and operational efficiency. Ars Administrandi, 15(2), 251–271. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2023-2-251-271

3. Anufrieva, A.A., & Krasnodubskaya, K.S. (2023). Digital transformation and assessment of the Russian Federation region public administration system’s “digital maturity”. Baikal Research Journal, 14(3), 1069–1086. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17150/2411–6262.2023.14(3).1069–1086

4. Bolshakova, K.Y., & Klimova, A.V. (2022). Regional management centers as a new form of management activity. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, 9(4), 391–400. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2022-9-4-391-400

5. Kasyanov, S.V. (2019). Digital transformation as a new driver of growth performance in the public sector and municipal administration. Regional Problems of Economic Transformation, (9), 5–12. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2019-9-5-12

6. Kochetkov, D.M. (2023). Modern trends in research assessment: The case of the Netherlands. Economics of Science, 9(3), 76–88. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2023-9-3-76-88

7. Popov, E.V., Simonova, V.L., & Cherepanov, V.V. (2021). Digital maturity levels of an industrial enterprise. Journal of New Economy, 22(2), 88–109. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2021-22-2-5

8. Popov, E.V., Chelak, I.P., & Kavetsky, S.A. (2024). Tomography of the territorial economic ecosystem’s sustainable development. Human Progress, 10(3), 4–26. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.34709/IM.1103.4

9. Sukharev, O.S. (2024a). Technological substitution: The key control modes. Upravlenets/The Manager, 15(2), 66–78. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-5

10. Sukharev, O.S. (2024b). “Economics of technology” as a scientific field: retrospective and prospective aspects. Economics of Science, 10(1), 41–53. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.22394/2410–132X-2024-10-1-41-53

11. Sukharev, O.S. (2024c). Sustainable development: “Acumulative effect” and “Distributed management”. Economic Science today: Collection of scientific articles (Issue 20, pp. 7–19). BNTU. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.21122/2309-6667-2024-20-7-19

12. Ahokangas, P., Matinmikko-Blue, M., Yrjölä, S., & Hämmäinen, H. (2021). Platform configurations for local and private 5G networks in complex industrial multi-stakeholder ecosystems. Telecommunications Policy, 45(5), 102128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102128, EDN: ANXMWR

13. Carolis, A., Macchi, M., Negri, E., & Terzi, S. (2017). A maturity model for assessing the digital readiness of manufacturing companies. In H. Lödding, R. Riedel, K.-D. Thoben, G. von Cieminski, & D. Kiritsis (Eds.), Advances in production management systems: The path to intelligent, collaborative and sustainable manufacturing (Vol. 513, pp. 13–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_2

14. Chang, J., Kadry, S.N., & Krishnamoorthy, S. (2020). Review and synthesis of Big Data analytics and computing for smart sustainable cities. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(11), 1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2020.0006, EDN: NCJPWO

15. Colovic, A., Caloffi, A., Rossi, F., & Russo, M. (2025). Institutionalizing the digital transformation: The role of digital innovation intermediaries. Research Policy, 54(1), 105146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105146

16. Dikhanbayeva, D., Shaikholla, S., Suleiman, Z., & Turkyilmaz, A. (2020). Assessment of Industry 4.0 maturity models by design principles. Sustainability, 12(23), 9927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239927, EDN: FJGGOX

17. Duba, W., & Maria, E.D. (2023). Assessment and support of the digitalization of businesses in Europe during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(1), 12717. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12717, EDN: YFCVOJ

18. Dwivedi, Y.K., Hughes, L., Kar, A.K., Baabdullah, A.M., Grover, P., Abbas, R., Andreini, D., Abumoghli, I., Barlette, Y., & Bunker, D. (2022). Climate change and COP26: Are digital technologies and information management part of the problem or the solution? An editorial reflection and call to action. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102456, EDN: NICSIS

19. Fischer-Presler, D., Bonaretti, D., & Bunker, D. (2024). Digital transformation in disaster management: A literature review. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 33(4), 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2024.101865, EDN: LPVKNL

20. Klötzer, C., & Pflaum, A. (2017). Toward the development of a maturity model for digitalization within the manufacturing industry’s supply chain. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4210–4219. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2017.509

21. Kochetkov, D., Vuković, D., Sadekov, N., & Levkiv, H. (2019). Smart cities and 5G networks: An emerging technological area? Journal of the Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 69(3), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI1903289K, EDN: OMQXMK

22. Konopik, J., Jahn, C., Schuster, T., Hoßbach, N., & Pflaum, A. (2022). Mastering the digital transformation through organizational capabilities: A conceptual framework. Digital Business, 2(2), 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100019, EDN: PCQZHM

23. Kretschmer, T., Leiponen, A., Schilling, M., & Vasudeva, G. (2022). Platform ecosystems as meta-organizations: Implications for platform strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3250, EDN: UIUHRX

24. Kuvayeva, Y.V. (2019). Digital economy: Concepts and Russia’s readiness to transition. Journal of the Ural State University of Economics, 20(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-1-3, EDN: PPLLVB

25. Langen, P.W. (2023). The strategy of the port development company: A framework based on the business ecosystems perspective and an application to the case of Port of Rotterdam. Maritime Transport Research, 4, 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2023.100089, EDN: BDUGFA

26. Langley, D.J., Rosca, E., Angelopoulos, M., Kamminga, O., & Hooijer, C. (2023). Orchestrating a smart circular economy: Guiding principles for digital product passports. Journal of Business Research, 169, 114259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114259, EDN: OKTJVX

27. Marciano, A., Nicita, A., & Ramello, G.B. (2020). Big data and big techs: Understanding the value of information in platform capitalism. European Journal of Law and Economics, 50, 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09675-1, EDN: BMDGMV

28. Pasalic, I.N., & Cukusic, M. (2024). Understanding E-participation adoption: Exploring technological, organizational, and environmental factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, 123633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123633, EDN: TXKEVY

29. Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., & Núñez-Chicharro, M. (2020). The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 154, 119973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119973, EDN: WWGYYP

30. Philipp, R. (2020). Digital readiness index assessment towards smart port development. Sustainability Management Forum, 28, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00501-5, EDN: TUBOPO

31. Popov, E.V. (2008). Transaction function. International Advances in Economic Research, 14, 474–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-008-9185-4, EDN: RHMZOJ

32. Restas, A., Tsakiris, A., Tsotakis, C., Kondodina, T., Giakoumoglou, N., Pechlivani, E.M., Tzovaras, D., & Ioannidis, D. (2024). A collaborative AR/VR platform for social manufacturing. Procedia Computer Science, 237, 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.160, EDN: FNLAKK

33. Roth, T., Stohr, A., Amend, J., Fridgen, G., & Rieger, A. (2023). Blockchain as a driving force for federalism: A theory of cross-organizational task-technology fit. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102476, EDN: EOPKLP

34. Sala-Vilaró, L.R., Li-Ying, J., & Traunecker, T. (2024). How do innovation intermediaries’ business models cope with their need to develop new digital services? Technovation, 131, 102950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102950, EDN: OTZMVJ

35. Senna, P.P., Roca, J.B., & Barros, A.C. (2023). Overcoming barriers to manufacturing digitalization: Policies across EU countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122822, EDN: DSAAGZ

36. Shojaei, R.S., & Burgess, G. (2022). Non-technical inhibitors: Exploring the adoption of digital innovation in UK construction industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 185, 122036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122036, EDN: FEIBGZ

37. Sorri, K., Yrjonkoski, K., & Seppanen, M. (2024). Smart cities, smarter values: Unpacking the ecosystem of urban innovation. Technology in Society, 77, 102499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102499, EDN: NGJXWI

38. Utama, D.R., Hamsal, M., Abdinagoro, S.B., & Rahim, R.K. (2024). Developing a digital transformation maturity model for port assessment in archipelago countries: The Indonesian case. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 26, 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101146, EDN: VXBUFZ

39. Uzunca, B., Sharapov, D., & Tee, R. (2022). Governance rigidity, industry evolution and value capture in platform ecosystem. Research Policy, 51(7), 104560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104560, EDN: MWPCQD

40. Villanueva-Merino, A., Urra-Uriarte, S., Izkara, J.L., Campos-Cordobés, S., Aranguren, A., & Molina-Costa, P. (2024). Leveraging local digital twins for planning age-friendly urban environments. Cities, 155, 105458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105458, EDN: GWHAIM

41. Weber, C., Königsberger, J., Kassner, L., & Mitschang, B. (2017). M2DDM – A maturity model for data driven manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 63, 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.309