RUSSIAN PATENT LANDSCAPE, CREATED BY THE RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTRY: ANALYSIS OF THE IDENTIFIED ISSUES
Abstract
It is suggested to reach the goal for channeling limited funds into the most productive research groups inRussiaby identifying so –called leading organisations among the scientific centres. As one of the criteria for selecting organisations with potential for creating the technological breakthrough on global markets will be an indicator of their patent activity. There are presented results of patent analysis, allowing to form a rating of owners of most extensive portfolios of Russian patents, as well as thematic fields, whereRussiademonstrated high levels of innovative activity in the period from 2010 to 2015. It is demonstrated that the structure of patent owners inRussiadefers in princiapl from the one established in industrially developed countries. InRussia, the accumulative share of patents, obtained by individual applicants and universities, amounted to 77,2% for the period under review, weares in developed countries this share hasn’t exceeded 10–15%. The article suggests using modern Russian scientific-technological and industrial politics to solve systematic issues, causing low scientific research intensity of domestic industrial sector, which enjoys less than 13% of patents inRussia, which is six times less than analogue indicators, in industrially developed countries.
About the Authors
N. G. Kurakova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Biological Sciences, Director of The Scientific-TechnicalCenter
L. A. Tsvetkova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD in Biological sciences, leading researcher of The Scientific-Technical Center
V. G. Zinov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Doctor of Economics, PhD in Technical sciences, Deputy Director of The Scientific-Technical Center
References
1. List of orders of the Russian President dated 21 January 2016 following the meeting of the Science and Education Committee (2016) / Official site of the Russian President. http://kremlin.ru/acts/assignments/orders/51302.
2. The meeting of the Science and Education Committee dated 21 January 2016 (2016) Стенограмма / Official site of the Russian President. http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/51190.
3. Intellectual Property Statistics (2016) World Intellectual Property Organization. http://www.wipo.int/ipstats/en/#national.
4. Patent Cooperation Treaty Yearly Review. The International Patent System (2015) WIPO. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_901_2015.pdf.
5. Annual Report 2014 (2015) European Patent Office. http://www.epo.org/about-us/annual-reportsstatistics/annual-report/2014.html.
6. IFI CLAIMS2015 Top 50 US Patent Assignees (2015) IFI CLAIMS Patent services. http://www.ificlaims.com/index.php?page=misc_top_50_2015.
7. 2015 IFI CLAIMS U. S. Patent Trends & Insights (2015) IFI CLAIMS Patent services. http://www.ificlaims.com/index.php?page=news&type=view&id=ificlaims%2F2015-u-s-patent-trends.
8. 2015 IFI CLAIMS Patentierungs-Trends Deutschland (2015) IFI CLAIMS Patent services. http://www.ificlaims.com/index.php? page=news&type=view&id=ifi-claims%2F2015-ifi-claims.
9. Patent Counts By Class By Year. Patents Granted: 1977–2015. A Patent Technology Monitoring Team Report (2015) U.S. patent and trademark office – Patent Technology Monitoring Team. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cbcby.htm.
10. Patent Counts By Country, State, and Year – All Patent Types. Patents Granted: 1977–2015. A Patent Technology Monitoring Team Report (2015) U.S. patent and trademark office – Patent Technology Monitoring Team. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/cbcby.htm
11. Lihodeev N. P. (2008) Patent information and innovations / Spb: Online. http://library.mephi.ru/files/Patentnye%20BD%20i%20osnovnye%20ponyatiya.pdf.
12. Meduneckij V. M. (2015) Content and structure of patent research.. – SPb: IFMO University. 46 p. 13. Zinov V. G., Kurakova N. G., Tsvetkova L. A. (2014) Breakthrough scientific research areas: formalization of the concept and status validation criteria // Scientific and technical information processing. V. 41. № 3. P. 194–200.
13. Kurakova N. G., Zinov V. G., Tsvetkova L. A., Yeremchenko O. A. et al. (2014) Scientific-technological politics of “fast reaction”: recommendations for Russia / Moscow: RANEPA. 160 p.
14. Petrov A. N., Kurakova N. G., Zinov V. G., Semin A. A. (2015) Key risks for a project «new production technologies» in the framework of the National technological initiative // Innovations. № 3 (197). P. 36–47.
15. Kurakova N. G., Zinov V. G., Tsvetkova L. A., Yeremchenko O. A. et al. (2015) Public analytical report on the subject of «new production technologies». Part 4. http://www.skoltech.ru/industry/scientificindustrial-policy-group/.
16. Derwent World Patents Index (2016) Thomson Reuters. http://thomsonreuters.ru/products/derwentworld-patents-index.
17. Inventions (full texts) – RUPAT (2016) The Federal Institute of Industrial property. http://www1.fips.ru/wps/wcm/connect/content_ru/ru/inform_resources/inform_retrieval_system/article_2/article_rupat.
18. The World’s Biggest Public Companies (2014) Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/global2000/list/#header:country_country:Russia.
19. World Intellectual Property Indicators – 2015 (2015) WIPO. http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_941_2015.pdf.
20. Millions for the backbones (2016) // Poisk. № 7. http://www.poisknews.ru/news/official/17686/.
21. Civil Codex of Russian Federation, part 4 dated 18 December 2006 № 230-FZ (2006) https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_64629
Review
For citations:
Kurakova N.G., Tsvetkova L.A., Zinov V.G. RUSSIAN PATENT LANDSCAPE, CREATED BY THE RESIDENTS OF THE COUNTRY: ANALYSIS OF THE IDENTIFIED ISSUES. Economics of Science. 2016;2(1):64-79. (In Russ.)
Views:
647
Email this article 